Literature DB >> 18785631

Technical note: Dental microwear textures of "Phase I" and "Phase II" facets.

Kristin L Krueger1, Jessica R Scott, Richard F Kay, Peter S Ungar.   

Abstract

The power stroke of mastication has been traditionally divided into two parts, one which precedes centric occlusion, and the other which follows it-"Phase I" and "Phase II," respectively. Recent studies of primate mastication have called into question the role of Phase II in food processing, as they have found little muscle activity or accompanying bone strain following centric occlusion. That said, many researchers today look to Phase II facets to relate diet to patterns of dental microwear. This suggests the need to reevaluate microwear patterns on Phase I facets. Here we use texture analysis to compare and contrast microwear on facets representing both phases in three primate species with differing diets (Alouatta palliata, Cebus apella, and Lophocebus albigena). Results reaffirm that microwear patterns on Phase II facets better distinguish taxa with differing diets than do those on Phase I facets. Further, differences in microwear textures between facet types for a given taxon may themselves reflect diet. Some possible explanations for differences in microwear textures between facet types are proposed. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18785631     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  9 in total

1.  Incorporating intraspecific variation into dental microwear texture analysis.

Authors:  Samuel D Arman; Thomas A A Prowse; Aidan M C Couzens; Peter S Ungar; Gavin J Prideaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Molar microwear textures and the diets of Australopithecus anamensis and Australopithecus afarensis.

Authors:  Peter S Ungar; Robert S Scott; Frederick E Grine; Mark F Teaford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Dental macrowear reveals ecological diversity of Gorilla spp.

Authors:  Teagan Harty; Michael A Berthaume; Eugenio Bortolini; Alistair R Evans; Jordi Galbany; Franck Guy; Ottmar Kullmer; Vincent Lazzari; Alejandro Romero; Luca Fiorenza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Molar macrowear reveals Neanderthal eco-geographic dietary variation.

Authors:  Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jeremy Tausch; Ottmar Kullmer; Timothy G Bromage; Friedemann Schrenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The primate community of Cachoeira (Brazilian Amazonia): a model to decipher ecological partitioning among extinct species.

Authors:  Anusha Ramdarshan; Thomas Alloing-Séguier; Gildas Merceron; Laurent Marivaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dietary niches of terrestrial cercopithecines from the Plio-Pleistocene Shungura Formation, Ethiopia: evidence from Dental Microwear Texture Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Martin; Chris-Alexander Plastiras; Gildas Merceron; Antoine Souron; Jean-Renaud Boisserie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A dental revolution: The association between occlusion and chewing behaviour.

Authors:  Christopher Martin Silvester; Ottmar Kullmer; Simon Hillson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Similar associations of tooth microwear and morphology indicate similar diet across marsupial and placental mammals.

Authors:  Hilary B Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tooth wear as a means to quantify intra-specific variations in diet and chewing movements.

Authors:  Ivan Calandra; Gaëlle Labonne; Ellen Schulz-Kornas; Thomas M Kaiser; Sophie Montuire
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.