JoEllen Vrazel1, Ruth P Saunders, Sara Wilcox. 1. Department of Exercise Science, School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, 817 23rd Street NW, Washington, DC 20052 , USA. jvrazel@gwu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary purposes of this review were to identify key social-environmental influences on the physical-activity behavior of women and to propose an organizing framework of these influences in the social environment. DATA SOURCES: Computerized searches of MEDLINE, Science Direct, and CINAHL were conducted to identify relevant research. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Studies were included if they used a sample of adult women or included gender-specific analysis, identified or measured some aspect of the social environment in relation to physical activity, and were published in English within the last two decades. DATA EXTRACTION: Characteristics of study design, sample population, and identified social-environmental variables were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Through an iterative review of the data by several researchers, common influences and themes were identified and organized into a social environment framework, which included the following components: social support/social networks, life transitions/ multiple roles, and cultural standards/gender role expectations. RESULTS: Women are exposed to societal messages that indicate physical activity is not a priority and may be inappropriate; they may also lack the social support necessary to adopt and maintain physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals the complex range of factors in the social environment that influence women, and it provides support for the importance of the social environment on physical-activity behavior in women. A social-environmental framework related to Bronfenbrenner's social ecological model is proposed along with recommended strategies to apply in interventions targeting women.
OBJECTIVE: The primary purposes of this review were to identify key social-environmental influences on the physical-activity behavior of women and to propose an organizing framework of these influences in the social environment. DATA SOURCES: Computerized searches of MEDLINE, Science Direct, and CINAHL were conducted to identify relevant research. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Studies were included if they used a sample of adult women or included gender-specific analysis, identified or measured some aspect of the social environment in relation to physical activity, and were published in English within the last two decades. DATA EXTRACTION: Characteristics of study design, sample population, and identified social-environmental variables were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Through an iterative review of the data by several researchers, common influences and themes were identified and organized into a social environment framework, which included the following components: social support/social networks, life transitions/ multiple roles, and cultural standards/gender role expectations. RESULTS:Women are exposed to societal messages that indicate physical activity is not a priority and may be inappropriate; they may also lack the social support necessary to adopt and maintain physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals the complex range of factors in the social environment that influence women, and it provides support for the importance of the social environment on physical-activity behavior in women. A social-environmental framework related to Bronfenbrenner's social ecological model is proposed along with recommended strategies to apply in interventions targeting women.
Authors: Linda Trinh; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Ryan E Rhodes; Scott North; Kerry S Courneya Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-09-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mark L Wieland; Jennifer A Weis; Tiffany Palmer; Miriam Goodson; Sheena Loth; Fatuma Omer; Adeline Abbenyi; Karen Krucker; Kim Edens; Irene G Sia Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2011-12-11
Authors: Deborah J Toobert; Lisa A Strycker; Diane K King; Manuel Barrera; Diego Osuna; Russell E Glasgow Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Liza S Rovniak; James F Sallis; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Christopher N Sciamanna; Elizabeth J Kiser; Chester A Ray; Vernon M Chinchilli; Ding Ding; Stephen A Matthews; Melissa Bopp; Daniel R George; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.295