OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in HIV-infected persons requiring hemodialysis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of HIV-infected hemodialysis patients receiving one 600 mg tablet daily of EFV (N = 13) or three 133.3/33.3 mg capsules twice daily of LPV/RTV (N = 13). METHODS: Twenty-four-hour EFV and 12-h LPV/RTV pharmacokinetics were assessed. Geometric mean ratios were calculated using historical controls with normal renal function. The effects of several candidate gene polymorphisms were also explored. RESULTS: The geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI); percentage of coefficient of variation (% CV)] Cmin, Cmax, and area under the curve (AUC) for the EFV group were 1.81 microg/ml (0.93, 3.53; 103%), 5.04 microg/ml (3.48, 7.29; 72%), and 71.5 microg h/ml (43.2, 118.3; 93%), respectively. These parameters were 2.76 microg/ml (1.86, 4.11; 53%), 8.45 microg/ml (6.41, 11.15; 52%), and 69.6 microg h/ml (55.6, 87.2; 37%) for LPV and 0.08 microg/ml (0.05, 0.14; 63%), 0.58 microg/ml (0.44, 0.76; 41%), and 3.74 microg h/ml (2.91, 4.80; 37%) for RTV. The AUC geometric mean ratios (90% CI) for EFV, LPV, and RTV were 132% (89, 197), 81% (67, 97), and 92% (76, 111), respectively. LPV Cmin was lower than expected in the hemodialysis group. Higher EFV concentrations were associated with the CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of EFV and LPV/RTV in hemodialysis suggests that no dosing adjustments are necessary in treatment-naive patients. As HIV-infected hemodialysis patients are disproportionately black, the increased frequency of the CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism may lead to higher EFV levels. The potentially lower LPV trough levels in this population suggest that LPV/RTV should be used with caution in protease-inhibitor-experienced patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in HIV-infectedpersons requiring hemodialysis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of HIV-infected hemodialysispatients receiving one 600 mg tablet daily of EFV (N = 13) or three 133.3/33.3 mg capsules twice daily of LPV/RTV (N = 13). METHODS: Twenty-four-hour EFV and 12-h LPV/RTV pharmacokinetics were assessed. Geometric mean ratios were calculated using historical controls with normal renal function. The effects of several candidate gene polymorphisms were also explored. RESULTS: The geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI); percentage of coefficient of variation (% CV)] Cmin, Cmax, and area under the curve (AUC) for the EFV group were 1.81 microg/ml (0.93, 3.53; 103%), 5.04 microg/ml (3.48, 7.29; 72%), and 71.5 microg h/ml (43.2, 118.3; 93%), respectively. These parameters were 2.76 microg/ml (1.86, 4.11; 53%), 8.45 microg/ml (6.41, 11.15; 52%), and 69.6 microg h/ml (55.6, 87.2; 37%) for LPV and 0.08 microg/ml (0.05, 0.14; 63%), 0.58 microg/ml (0.44, 0.76; 41%), and 3.74 microg h/ml (2.91, 4.80; 37%) for RTV. The AUC geometric mean ratios (90% CI) for EFV, LPV, and RTV were 132% (89, 197), 81% (67, 97), and 92% (76, 111), respectively. LPV Cmin was lower than expected in the hemodialysis group. Higher EFV concentrations were associated with the CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of EFV and LPV/RTV in hemodialysis suggests that no dosing adjustments are necessary in treatment-naive patients. As HIV-infected hemodialysispatients are disproportionately black, the increased frequency of the CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism may lead to higher EFV levels. The potentially lower LPV trough levels in this population suggest that LPV/RTV should be used with caution in protease-inhibitor-experienced patients.
Authors: David W Haas; Heather J Ribaudo; Richard B Kim; Camlin Tierney; Grant R Wilkinson; Roy M Gulick; David B Clifford; Todd Hulgan; Catia Marzolini; Edward P Acosta Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-12-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: David B Clifford; Scott Evans; Yijun Yang; Edward P Acosta; Karl Goodkin; Karen Tashima; David Simpson; David Dorfman; Heather Ribaudo; Roy M Gulick Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gregory M Lucas; Michael J Ross; Peter G Stock; Michael G Shlipak; Christina M Wyatt; Samir K Gupta; Mohamed G Atta; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Paul A Pham; Leslie A Bruggeman; Jeffrey L Lennox; Patricio E Ray; Robert C Kalayjian Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Yoninah S Cramer; Susan L Rosenkranz; Stephen D Hall; Lynda A Szczech; Valerianna Amorosa; Samir K Gupta Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Markus Zeitlinger; Birgit C P Koch; Roger Bruggemann; Pieter De Cock; Timothy Felton; Maya Hites; Jennifer Le; Sonia Luque; Alasdair P MacGowan; Deborah J E Marriott; Anouk E Muller; Kristina Nadrah; David L Paterson; Joseph F Standing; João P Telles; Michael Wölfl-Duchek; Michael Thy; Jason A Roberts Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 6.447