Literature DB >> 18784438

CA 19-9 response as an early indicator of the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Yousuke Nakai1, Takao Kawabe, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Hiroshi Yagioka, Yoko Yashima, Hirofumi Kogure, Toshihiko Arizumi, Osamu Togawa, Yukiko Ito, Saburo Matsubara, Kenji Hirano, Naoki Sasahira, Takeshi Tsujino, Minoru Tada, Masao Omata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The CA 19-9 decline 8 weeks after gemcitabine administration has been shown to be a useful prognosticator of survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of changes in CA 19-9 levels 4 weeks after treatment initiation on overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP).
METHODS: We evaluated 72 patients who received gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. The serum CA 19-9 level was measured routinely at baseline (CA 19-9_Pre) and after the first (4 weeks; CA 19-9_A1) and second (8 weeks; CA 19-9_A2) courses. CA 19-9 responses were categorized into quartiles using the proportional change in CA 19-9.
RESULTS: The rates of decrease in CA 19-9_A1 and CA 19-9_A2 were strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.8981, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that an early CA 19-9 response was prognostic of OS and TTP in addition to CA 19-9_Pre and performance status. Compared with the first quartile of an early CA 19-9 response, hazard ratios for the second, third and fourth quartiles were 0.91 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.59-1.34), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.45-1.08), and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41-0.94) for TTP, respectively (p for trend = 0.002), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.61-1.49), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.40-1.08) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.50-1.21) for OS (p for trend = 0.036).
CONCLUSION: CA 19-9 response after the first course of gemcitabine was a prognosticator of OS and TTP in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18784438     DOI: 10.1159/000155213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  9 in total

1.  Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Romain Altwegg; Marc Ychou; Vanessa Guillaumon; Simon Thezenas; Pierre Senesse; Nicolas Flori; Thibault Mazard; Ludovic Caillo; Stéphanie Faure; Emmanuelle Samalin; Eric Assenat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A phase II trial of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination (GSL) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kei Saito; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Yousuke Nakai; Kazunaga Ishigaki; Mariko Tanaka; Takeyuki Watadani; Junichi Arita; Naminatsu Takahara; Suguru Mizuno; Hirofumi Kogure; Hideaki Ijichi; Keisuke Tateishi; Minoru Tada; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Masashi Fukayama; Norihiro Kokudo; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Prognostic relevance of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH kinetics in patients treated with palliative second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Haas; Rüdiger P Laubender; Petra Stieber; Stefan Holdenrieder; Christiane J Bruns; Ralf Wilkowski; Ulrich Mansmann; Volker Heinemann; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-05-18

4.  A phase II trial of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination (GSL) therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kei Saito; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Naminatsu Takahara; Kazunaga Ishigaki; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Ryunosuke Hakuta; Tomotaka Saito; Rie Uchino; Takahiro Kishikawa; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Suguru Mizuno; Takashi Sasaki; Hirofumi Kogure; Saburo Matsubara; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Hideaki Ijichi; Keisuke Tateishi; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Outcomes with FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Brian A Boone; Jennifer Steve; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Amer H Zureikat; Barry C Lembersky; Michael K Gibson; Ronald G Stoller; Herbert J Zeh; Nathan Bahary
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Predictors of analgesic efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of timing.

Authors:  Duck Mi Yoon; Kyung Bong Yoon; In Chan Baek; Seo Hee Ko; Shin Hyung Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Soluble VCAM-1 promotes gemcitabine resistance via macrophage infiltration and predicts therapeutic response in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ryota Takahashi; Hideaki Ijichi; Makoto Sano; Koji Miyabayashi; Dai Mohri; Jinsuk Kim; Gen Kimura; Takuma Nakatsuka; Hiroaki Fujiwara; Keisuke Yamamoto; Yotaro Kudo; Yasuo Tanaka; Keisuke Tateishi; Yousuke Nakai; Yasuyuki Morishita; Katsura Soma; Norihiko Takeda; Harold L Moses; Hiroyuki Isayama; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prognostic nomogram for nonresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  T Hamada; Y Nakai; H Yasunaga; H Isayama; H Matsui; N Takahara; T Sasaki; K Takagi; T Watanabe; H Yagioka; H Kogure; T Arizumi; N Yamamoto; Y Ito; K Hirano; T Tsujino; M Tada; K Koike
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Predicting Adverse Pathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Resectable Pancreas Cancer With Preoperative CA 19-9.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; Scott C Lester; Rondell P Graham; William S Harmsen; Lizhi Zhang; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Rory L Smoot; Hunter C Gits; Wen Wee Ma; Dawn Owen; Amit Mahipal; Robert C Miller; Michelle A Neben Wittich; Sean P Cleary; Robert R McWilliams; Michael G Haddock; Christopher L Hallemeier; Mark J Truty; Kenneth W Merrell
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.