Tobias S Köhler1, Kevin T McVary. 1. Division of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) and the potential interplay of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-I) have clinical implications for both patient screening and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current literature assessing the LUTS-ED relationship and the role of PDE5-I from both a basic science and clinical intervention perspective. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We focused on data recently published (1990-2008) describing epidemiologic and mechanistic manuscripts of the LUTS-ED relationship with emphasis on papers involving PDE5-I-particularly those using level 1 evidence clinical trials. Base key words used included BPH, LUTS, ED, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors in combination with such secondary key words as nitric oxide, autonomic hyperactivity, Rho-kinase, atherosclerosis, and mechanism. We abstracted >200 articles and reviewed >100. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The large overlap of elderly men with both LUTS and ED likely stems from a cause-and-effect relationship. Thus far, four proposed mechanisms attempt to explain the relationship between LUTS and ED. Multiple studies showing that PDE5-I improved LUTS have been performed. Understanding the role of PDE5-I in the LUTS and ED relationship affects patient screening and treatment but also raises further research questions. CONCLUSIONS: The future use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors as either prophylaxis or as a primary treatment for LUTS looms as a possibility and may not be limited to men.
CONTEXT: The relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) and the potential interplay of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-I) have clinical implications for both patient screening and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current literature assessing the LUTS-ED relationship and the role of PDE5-I from both a basic science and clinical intervention perspective. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We focused on data recently published (1990-2008) describing epidemiologic and mechanistic manuscripts of the LUTS-ED relationship with emphasis on papers involving PDE5-I-particularly those using level 1 evidence clinical trials. Base key words used included BPH, LUTS, ED, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors in combination with such secondary key words as nitric oxide, autonomic hyperactivity, Rho-kinase, atherosclerosis, and mechanism. We abstracted >200 articles and reviewed >100. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The large overlap of elderly men with both LUTS and ED likely stems from a cause-and-effect relationship. Thus far, four proposed mechanisms attempt to explain the relationship between LUTS and ED. Multiple studies showing that PDE5-I improved LUTS have been performed. Understanding the role of PDE5-I in the LUTS and ED relationship affects patient screening and treatment but also raises further research questions. CONCLUSIONS: The future use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors as either prophylaxis or as a primary treatment for LUTS looms as a possibility and may not be limited to men.
Authors: Radojica V Stolic; Zoran M Bukumiric; Aleksandar N Jovanovic; Vladan M Peric; Sasa R Sovtic; Branislav P Belic; Nebojsa B Mitic Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2011-03-05 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Xinhua Zhang; Ning Zang; Yu Wei; Jin Yin; Ruobing Teng; Allen Seftel; Michael E Disanto Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Benjamin P Sharpe; Annette Hayden; Antigoni Manousopoulou; Andrew Cowie; Robert C Walker; Jack Harrington; Fereshteh Izadi; Stella P Breininger; Jane Gibson; Oliver Pickering; Eleanor Jaynes; Ewan Kyle; John H Saunders; Simon L Parsons; Alison A Ritchie; Philip A Clarke; Pamela Collier; Nigel P Mongan; David O Bates; Kiren Yacqub-Usman; Spiros D Garbis; Zoë Walters; Matthew Rose-Zerilli; Anna M Grabowska; Timothy J Underwood Journal: Cell Rep Med Date: 2022-06-21