OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP), designed to support and enhance infants' self-regulatory competence, improved developmental and neurobehavioral outcomes in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 86 infants to 1 intervention before discharge and to 6 to 8 home interventions until 6 months corrected age, and 90 control infants receivedstandard care. Developmental and behavioral outcomes were evaluated at 6 months corrected age with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II). Neurobehavioral functioning was evaluated with the Infant Behavioral Assessment (IBA) at baseline and at 6 months corrected age. RESULTS: Despite randomization, some differences in neonatal characteristics were found between the intervention and control infants. After adjustment, intervention effects of 7.2 points (+/- standard error 3.1) on the Mental Developmental Index and 6.4 +/- 2.4 points on the Psychomotor Developmental Index favored the intervention infants. The Behavioral Rating Scale of the BSID-II (P = .000) and the IBA (more approach [P = .003] and less stress [P = .001] over time) also favored the intervention infants. CONCLUSIONS: The IBAIP improved the mental, motor, and behavioral outcomes of VLBW infants at 6 months corrected age.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program (IBAIP), designed to support and enhance infants' self-regulatory competence, improved developmental and neurobehavioral outcomes in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 86 infants to 1 intervention before discharge and to 6 to 8 home interventions until 6 months corrected age, and 90 control infants received standard care. Developmental and behavioral outcomes were evaluated at 6 months corrected age with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II). Neurobehavioral functioning was evaluated with the Infant Behavioral Assessment (IBA) at baseline and at 6 months corrected age. RESULTS: Despite randomization, some differences in neonatal characteristics were found between the intervention and control infants. After adjustment, intervention effects of 7.2 points (+/- standard error 3.1) on the Mental Developmental Index and 6.4 +/- 2.4 points on the Psychomotor Developmental Index favored the intervention infants. The Behavioral Rating Scale of the BSID-II (P = .000) and the IBA (more approach [P = .003] and less stress [P = .001] over time) also favored the intervention infants. CONCLUSIONS: The IBAIP improved the mental, motor, and behavioral outcomes of VLBW infants at 6 months corrected age.
Authors: Sonia Khurana; Audrey E Kane; Shaaron E Brown; Talicia Tarver; Stacey C Dusing Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Christiaan J A Geldof; Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis; Marjolein Dik; Joke H Kok; Jaap Oosterlaan Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Daria I Chernego; Robert B McCall; Shannon B Wanless; Christina J Groark; Marina J Vasilyeva; Oleg I Palmov; Natalia V Nikiforova; Rifkat J Muhamedrahimov Journal: Infants Young Child Date: 2018-01-01
Authors: Tjitske Hielkema; Elisa G Hamer; Heleen A Reinders-Messelink; Carel G B Maathuis; Arend F Bos; Tineke Dirks; Lily van Doormaal; Johannes Verheijden; Carla Vlaskamp; Eline Lindeman; Mijna Hadders-Algra Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 2.125