Literature DB >> 18783684

Endoscopic requirements of colorectal cancer screening programs in average-risk population. Estimation according to a Markov model.

Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta1, Marta Trapero-Bertran, Antoni Castells, Xavier Mas-Canal, Francesc Balaguer, Maria Pellisé, Victòria Gonzalo, Teresa Ocaña, Antoni Trilla, Josep M Piqué.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies are quite common in the United States, their systematic introduction in Europe has been delayed until the year 2008. To estimate endoscopic requirements of four different CRC screening strategies (annual and biennial fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years) in an average-risk population.
METHODS: A long-term Markov process model was designed combining three adherence rates for the four above-mentioned screening strategies in individuals aged from 50 to 74. Estimations included endoscopic procedures performed for both screening and surveillance purposes. Models were adjusted for age-related adenoma and CRC incidence rates, life expectancy, and cancer-related survival.
RESULTS: The mean number of annual colonoscopies per 100,000 individuals aged 50-74 ranged from 100 to 271 for annual FOBT, from 75 to 203 for biennial FOBT, from 222 to 601 for sigmoidoscopy, and from 903 to 2,449 for colonoscopy-based strategies, depending on the adherence rate. According to these estimations, annual and biennial FOBT strategies would generate a slight decrease of current endoscopic activity (1.4-3.8% and 2.7-7.2%, respectively), whereas sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy-based strategies would induce a 4.7-12.8% and 32-87% increase, respectively, with respect to a non-screening scenario. The model confirmed a 3-16% mean reduction of CRC incidence depending on the strategy and adherence rate.
CONCLUSION: Whereas endoscopic capacity exists for widespread CRC screening with annual or biennial FOBT, implementation of potentially more effective strategies, such as flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, would result in a significant increase of current endoscopic resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783684     DOI: 10.1157/13125585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0210-5705            Impact factor:   2.102


  7 in total

Review 1.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

2.  Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Z Gimeno García; Y González; E Quintero; D Nicolás-Pérez; Z Adrián; R Romero; O Alarcón Fernández; M Hernández; M Carrillo; V Felipe; J Díaz; L Ramos; M Moreno; A Jiménez-Sosa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; Elizabeth A Glowinski; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Modeling screening, prevention, and delaying of Alzheimer's disease: an early-stage decision analytic model.

Authors:  Nicolas M Furiak; Robert W Klein; Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski; Eric R Siemers; Eric Sarpong; Timothy M Klein
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Anticipating implementation of colorectal cancer screening in The Netherlands: a nation wide survey on endoscopic supply and demand.

Authors:  Sietze T van Turenhout; Jochim S Terhaar sive Droste; Gerrit A Meijer; Ad A Masclée; Chris J J Mulder
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Long-Term Prediction of the Demand of Colonoscopies Generated by a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Mercè Comas; Joan Mendivil; Montserrat Andreu; Cristina Hernández; Xavier Castells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Simulation modeling validity and utility in colorectal cancer screening delivery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Heather Smith; Peyman Varshoei; Robin Boushey; Craig Kuziemsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.