Literature DB >> 18783580

Causes of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital.

A Ohsaka1, M Kobayashi, K Abe.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The objective of this study was to assess the cause of failure of bedside barcode identification before blood administration. The bedside check is the most critical step for prevention of mistransfusion. A barcode patient-blood unit identification system was implemented in all inpatient wards, operating rooms and an outpatient haematology unit in July 2002. The transfusion service monitored compliance with bedside barcode identification and checked it at 24 h or 1 h after issuing of blood. If electronic checking was not completed at that time, the transfusion service clarified the cause of failure and indicated the immediate use of the issued blood when it was not yet transfused. From April 2004 to December 2007, a total of 43 068 blood components were transfused without a single mistransfusion and 958 transfusions (2.2%) were performed without electronic checking. The overall compliance rate with bedside barcode identification was 97.8%, and it was 99.5% in the past 6 months. The cause of failure of bedside barcode identification was human error in 811 cases (84.7%), handheld device error in 74 (7.7%), system error in 50 (5.2%) and wristband error in 23 (2.4%). The number of errors leading to failure of bedside barcode identification was decreased for human errors, especially manipulation errors, after initiation of notification at 1 h after issuing of blood. The transfusion service may have an important role in increasing transfusion safety by monitoring compliance with bedside verification and bedside use of issued blood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783580     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2008.00868.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  6 in total

1.  Improved traceability and transfusion safety with a new portable computerised system in a hospital with intermediate transfusion activity.

Authors:  María Jose Uríz; Maria Luisa Antelo; Saioa Zalba; Nazaret Ugalde; Esther Pena; Andrea Corcoz
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Recommendations for the electronic pre-transfusion check at the bedside.

Authors:  Akimichi Ohsaka; Hidefumi Kato; Shuichi Kino; Kinuyo Kawabata; Junichi Kitazawa; Tatsuya Sugimoto; Akihiro Takeshita; Kyoko Baba; Motohiro Hamaguchi; Yasuhiko Fujii; Kayo Horiuchi; Yuji Yonemura; Isao Hamaguchi; Makoto Handa
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Use of an identification system based on biometric data for patients requiring transfusions guarantees transfusion safety and traceability.

Authors:  Francesco Bennardello; Carmelo Fidone; Sergio Cabibbo; Salvatore Calabrese; Giovanni Garozzo; Grazia Cassarino; Agostino Antolino; Giuseppe Tavolino; Nuccio Zisa; Cadigia Falla; Giuseppe Drago; Giovanna Di Stefano; Pietro Bonomo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Rosemary R C McEachan; Sally J Giles; Reema Sirriyeh; Ian S Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Contemporary issues in transfusion medicine informatics.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Anil V Parwani; Jay S Raval; Darrell J Triulzi; Richard J Benjamin; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-01-07

6.  Recommendations for Using Barcode in Hospital Process.

Authors:  Peyman Rezaei Hachesu; Leila Zyaei; Hadi Hassankhani
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-06-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.