Literature DB >> 18783426

Alveolar ridge regeneration with equine spongy bone: a clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical case series.

Danilo Alessio Di Stefano1, Luciano Artese, Giovanna Iezzi, Adriano Piattelli, Stefano Pagnutti, Marcello Piccirilli, Vittoria Perrotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the case of localized ridge atrophy, a ridge augmentation procedure, with the use of bone substitutes and barrier membranes, may then be necessary.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was a clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical evaluation of an equine spongy bone in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients showing horizontal mandibular ridge defects participated in this study. A ridge augmentation was performed through an onlay apposition of equine bone covered by a titanium-reinforced membrane. After 6 months of healing, five bone cores from nonaugmented sites (control) and five from augmented sites (test) were retrieved.
RESULTS: In test sites, no postoperative complications occurred. Horizontal bone width increased from 24 to 37 mm. In control sites, the newly formed bone represented 33%, and in test sites, 35% of the total area. The mean value of the microvessel density was 25.6 +/- 3.425 per mm(2) in controls, while 33.3 +/- 2.5 vessels per mm(2) in the test sites were found (p < .05). Both groups showed a high intensity (++) of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in the newly formed bone, while a low intensity (+) was found in the mature bone.
CONCLUSION: Equine bone appeared to be biocompatible and to be associated with new vessel ingrowth. Within the limits of the small sample size, the present study indicated that equine bone could be used in mandibular ridge augmentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783426     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  13 in total

1.  Guided Bone Regeneration of an Atrophic Mandible with a Heterologous Bone Block.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gian Battista Greco; Francesco Riboli
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 2.  A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Francesco Orlando; Marco Ottobelli; Davide Fiori; Umberto Garagiola
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Subcranial Le Fort III Advancement with Equine-Derived Bone Grafts to Correct Syndromic Midfacial Hypoplasia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Beniamino Mattioli; Paolo Iacoviello; Carola Aldiano; Giuseppe Verrina
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures through equine-derived biomaterial or calvaria autologous bone: immunohistochemical evaluation of OPG/RANKL in humans.

Authors:  S Tetè; R Vinci; V L Zizzari; S Zara; V La Scala; A Cataldi; E Gherlone; A Piattelli
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Periodontal regeneration capacity of equine particulate bone in canine alveolar bone defects.

Authors:  Tae-Il Kim; Chong-Pyoung Chung; Min-Suk Heo; Yoon-Jeong Park; Sang-Hoon Rhee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Shalash; Hatem A Rahman; Amr A Azim; Amani H Neemat; Hesham E Hawary; Sherine A Nasry
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-12-01

7.  Physicochemical characteristics of bone substitutes used in oral surgery in comparison to autogenous bone.

Authors:  Antoine Berberi; Antoine Samarani; Nabih Nader; Ziad Noujeim; Maroun Dagher; Wasfi Kanj; Rita Mearawi; Ziad Salemeh; Bassam Badran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jung-Seok Lee; Jae-Kook Cha; Chang-Sung Kim
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Chemical, Clinical and Histomorphometric Comparison between Equine Bone Manufactured through Enzymatic Antigen-Elimination and Bovine Bone Made Non-Antigenic Using a High-Temperature Process in Post-Extractive Socket Grafting. A Comparative Retrospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Terry Zaniol; Lorenzo Cinci; Laura Pieri
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-01

10.  Steam Sterilization of Equine Bone Block: Morphological and Collagen Analysis.

Authors:  R Lo Giudice; G Rizzo; A Centofanti; A Favaloro; D Rizzo; G Cervino; R Squeri; B G Costa; V La Fauci; G Lo Giudice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.