Literature DB >> 18783421

Two-year outcome with Nobel Direct implants: a retrospective radiographic and microbiologic study in 10 patients.

Tommie Van de Velde1, Eric Thevissen, G Rutger Persson, Carina Johansson, Hugo De Bruyn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Nobel Direct implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) was developed to minimize marginal bone resorption and to result in "soft tissue integration" for an optimized aesthetic outcome. However, conflicting results have been presented in the literature. The aim of this present study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic outcomes of Nobel Direct implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten partially edentulous subjects without evidence of active periodontitis (mean age 55 years) received 12 Nobel Direct implants. Implants were loaded with single crowns after a healing period of 3 to 6 months. Treatment outcomes were assessed at month 24. Routine clinical assessments, intraoral radiographs, and microbiologic samplings were made. Histologic analysis of one failing implant and chemical spectroscopy around three unused implants was performed. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the evaluation of bone loss; otherwise, descriptive analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Implants were functionally loaded after 3 to 6 months. At 2 years, the mean bone loss of remaining implants was 2.0 mm (SD +/- 1.1 mm; range: 0.0-3.4 mm). Three out of 12 implants with an early mean bone loss >3 mm were lost. The surviving implants showed increasing bone loss between 6 and 24 months (p = .028). Only 3 out of the 12 implants were considered successful and showed bone loss of <1.7 mm after 2 years. High rates of pathogens, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Tanerella forsythia, were found. Chemical spectroscopy revealed, despite the normal signals from Ti, O, and C, also peaks of P, F, S, N, and Ca. A normal histologic image of osseointegration was observed in the apical part of the retrieved implant.
CONCLUSION: Radiographic evidence and 25% implant failures are indications of a low success rate. High counts and prevalence of significant pathogens were found at surviving implants. Although extensive bone loss had occurred in the coronal part, the apical portion of the implant showed some bone to implant integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783421     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  3 in total

1.  Effect of ozone on periodontopathogenic species--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sigrun Eick; Marius Tigan; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study.

Authors:  Seçil Karakoca Nemli; Merve Bankoğlu Güngör; Cemal Aydın; Handan Yılmaz; Bilge Turhan Bal; Yeliz Kaşko Arıcı
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Survival of Dyna Implants: A Retrospective Study with 1 to 6 Years of Follow up.

Authors:  Hamidreza Barikani; Mohadeseh Heidari; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Amir Reza Rokn
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-12-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.