Literature DB >> 18783416

Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study.

Federico Gualini1, Gianluigi Gualini, Roberto Cominelli, Ulf Lekholm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A gradual progression from a two-stage surgical technique to a one-stage and even immediate surgical protocol has occurred during the last decade with most oral implant systems. However, every new approach must obviously be reported individually, with long-term results, in order to assess whether the changes have any real patient value.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present report was to retrospectively review the 5-year outcome of patients treated with the Brånemark Novum (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) protocol.
METHODS: The first 15 patients treated according to the Novum procedure in a private specialist clinic in Lovere, Italy, were followed-up with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analyses. All the patients' fixed constructions had been in function for an average of 5 years. Parameters recorded were implant survival, prosthesis success, oral hygiene and mucosal health, marginal bone remodeling, type and frequency of complications, and patient's opinion of the treatment outcome.
RESULTS: After 5 years, the cumulative survival rate for implants was 91%, and for inserted bridge constructions it was 87%. Very small changes in implant stability occurred during implant loading from 1 to 5 years. Oral health conditions were good; 87% of mucosal quadrants around the implants were free from signs of inflammation. Very small marginal bone height changes were observed at the implants during the examination period, and except for four implant losses reported, severe complications were few. All patients were satisfied with the functional outcome of their constructions, but two patients were not completely happy with the aesthetics of their bridgework as supplied.
CONCLUSION: This report shows 5-year evidence of acceptably good results with the Brånemark Novum implant technique in edentulous mandibles, when using only three implants to support the fixed bridge construction, and as long as inserted implants become and remain osseointegrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783416     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  3 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire.

Authors:  Susanna Annibali; Anna Rita Vestri; Annalisa Pilotto; Gerardo La Monaca; Stefano Di Carlo; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-02-13

Review 2.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 3.  Variety of Surgical Guides and Protocols for Bone Reduction Prior to Implant Placement: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Eitan Mijiritsky; Hadar Ben Zaken; Maayan Shacham; Ihsan Caglar Cinar; Cem Tore; Katalin Nagy; Scott D Ganz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.