Literature DB >> 18783415

Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.

Anders Ortorp1, Torsten Jemt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative long-term knowledge of different framework materials in the edentulous implant patient is not available for 15 years of follow-up.
PURPOSE: To report and compare a 15-year retrospective data on implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible provided with laser-welded titanium frameworks (test) and gold alloy frameworks (control).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether, 155 patients were consecutively treated with abutment-level prostheses with two early generations of fixed laser-welded titanium frameworks (titanium group). Fifty-three selected patients with gold alloy castings formed the control group. Clinical and radiographic 15-year data were collected and compared for the groups.
RESULTS: All patients who were followed up for 15 years (n = 72) still had a fixed prosthesis in the mandible at the termination of the study. The 15-year original prosthesis cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 89.2 and 100% for titanium and control frameworks (p = .057), respectively (overall CSR 91.7%). The overall 15-year implant CSR was 98.7%. The average 15-year bone loss was 0.59 mm (SD 0.56) and 0.98 mm (SD 0.64) for the test and control groups (p = .027), respectively. Few (1.3%) implants had >3.1-mm accumulated bone loss after 15 years. The most common complications for titanium frameworks were resin or veneer fractures and soft tissue inflammation. Fractures of the titanium metal frame were observed in 15.5% of the patients. More patients had framework fractures in the earliest titanium group (Ti-1 group) compared to the gold alloy group (p = .034). Loose and fractured implant screw components were few (2.4%).
CONCLUSION: Predictable overall long-term results could be maintained with the present treatment modality. Fractures of the metal frames and remade prostheses were more common in the test group, and the gold alloy frameworks had a tendency to work better when compared with welded titanium frameworks during 15 years. However, on the average, more bone loss was observed for implants supporting gold alloy frameworks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783415     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00119.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  6 in total

Review 1.  Dental occlusion: modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics.

Authors:  Gunnar E Carlsson
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  The Prosthetic Complications and the Survival of the Implant-Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: An Original Study.

Authors:  Nag Bhushan Mandal; Akanksha Kumari; Bhavan Chand Yemineni; Manish Airan; Rahul V C Tiwari; Rajesh Damarasingu; Heena Dixit Tiwari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

Review 3.  Implications of considering peri-implant bone loss a disease, a narrative review.

Authors:  Tomas Albrektsson; Pentti Tengvall; Luis Amengual-Peñafiel; Pierluigi Coli; Georgios Kotsakis; David L Cochran
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.259

4.  Tilted implants for full-arch rehabilitations in completely edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Nicolò Cavalli; Bruno Barbaro; Davide Spasari; Francesco Azzola; Alberto Ciatti; Luca Francetti
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-10-23

5.  Fit of cobalt-chromium implant frameworks before and after ceramic veneering in comparison with CNC-milled titanium frameworks.

Authors:  Per Svanborg; Victoria Stenport; Alf Eliasson
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2015-10-26

6.  Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses.

Authors:  Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Jose-Antonio Alvarez-Riesgo; Santiago Llorente-Pendas; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Angel Alvarez-Arenal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.