Literature DB >> 18783393

The clinical and economic burden of nonadherence with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy in hypertensive patients.

Spencer B Cherry1, Joshua S Benner, Mohamed A Hussein, Simon S K Tang, Michael B Nichol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine lifetime costs, morbidity, and mortality associated with varying adherence to antihypertensive and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statin) therapy in a hypertensive population.
METHODS: A model was constructed to compare costs and outcomes under three adherence scenarios: no treatment, ideal adherence, and real-world adherence. Simulated patients' characteristics matched those of participants in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm and event probabilities were calculated with Framingham Heart Study risk equations. The real-world adherence scenario employed adherence data from an observational study of a US population; risk reductions at each level of adherence were based on linear extrapolations from clinical trials. Outputs included life expectancy, frequencies of primary and secondary coronary heart disease and stroke, and direct medical costs in 2006 US$. The incremental cost per life-year gained and incremental cost per event avoided were calculated comparing the three adherence scenarios.
RESULTS: Mean life expectancy was 14.73 years (no-treatment scenario), 15.07 (real-world adherence), and 15.49 (ideal adherence). The average number of cardiovascular events per patients was 0.738 (no treatment), 0.610 (real-world adherence), and 0.441 (ideal adherence). The incremental cost of real-world adherence versus no treatment is $30,585 per life-year gained, and ideal adherence versus real-world adherence is $22,121 per life-year gained.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive and statin therapy at real-world adherence levels can be expected to receive approximately 50% of the potential benefit seen in clinical trials. Depending on its cost, the incremental benefits of an effective adherence intervention program could make it an attractive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783393     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00447.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  24 in total

1.  Early Medication Nonadherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights into Actionable Opportunities From the TReatment with ADP receptor iNhibitorS: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) Study.

Authors:  Robin Mathews; Eric D Peterson; Emily Honeycutt; Chee Tang Chin; Mark B Effron; Marjorie Zettler; Gregg C Fonarow; Timothy D Henry; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 2.  Improving Adherence to Treatment and Reducing Economic Costs of Hypertension: The Role of Olmesartan-Based Treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Vittorio Costa
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-07-10

3.  Kidney function and long-term medication adherence after myocardial infarction in the elderly.

Authors:  Tara I Chang; Manisha Desai; Daniel H Solomon; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Beliefs and practices of Greek doctors in relation to patients' adherence to antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  A Barbouni; M Nalmpanti; D Gennimata; D Theodoridis; K Merakou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Simultaneous treatment to attain blood pressure and lipid goals and reduced CV risk burden using amlodipine/atorvastatin single-pill therapy in treated hypertensive participants in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard Grimm; Mobin Malik; Carla Yunis; Santosh Sutradhar; Attila Kursun
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-05-06

6.  Hospital Variation in Adherence Rates to Secondary Prevention Medications and the Implications on Quality.

Authors:  Robin Mathews; William Wang; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Laine Thomas; Rashmee U Shah; Murtuza Ali; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A simple informative intervention in primary care increases statin adherence.

Authors:  Manuela Casula; Elena Tragni; Rossana Piccinelli; Antonella Zambon; Luisa De Fendi; Lorenza Scotti; Giovanni Corrao; Marco Gambera; Alberico Luigi Catapano; Alessandro Filippi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Sustained blood pressure-lowering effect of aliskiren compared with telmisartan after a single missed dose.

Authors:  Rainer Düsing; Patrick Brunel; InYoung Baek; Fabio Baschiera
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  ASH position paper: Adherence and persistence with taking medication to control high blood pressure.

Authors:  Martha N Hill; Nancy H Miller; Sabina DeGeest
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  The effect of copayments for prescriptions on adherence to prescription medicines in publicly insured populations; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah-Jo Sinnott; Claire Buckley; David O'Riordan; Colin Bradley; Helen Whelton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.