Literature DB >> 18783291

The benefits and challenges of using computer-assisted symptom assessments in oncology clinics: results of a qualitative assessment.

Tami L Mark1, Gina Johnson, Barry Fortner, Katheryn Ryan.   

Abstract

Developed for clinical use in oncology settings, the Patient Assessment, Care & Education (PACE) System is a computer technology tool designed to address the under-identification and treatment of chemotherapy-related symptoms. This system includes general core questions together with the Patient Care Monitor (PCM), a validated questionnaire that assesses patient-reported problems, six symptom burden indices, and one global quality of life index. The system automatically scores the PCM and generates a written report. The objective of this study was to assess the manner in which clinicians use this system and identify the benefits and challenges that oncology clinics may face when adopting this system. The study was part of a larger evaluation of the system that included standardized surveys and chart review. Sixteen providers (physicians, nurses, and physician assistants) at 13 community oncology clinics participated in a 30-minute interview. Responses were coded according to common phrases or concepts. Clinicians indicated that they use the system mainly for symptom assessment or review of systems. The most common benefits identified included the improved ability to identify under-reported symptoms, enhanced communication with patients; increased efficiency; and its ability to highlight patients' most bothersome symptoms. Challenges included patient burden from the frequent need to answer the questionnaires, issues with the wording and formatting of the screening questionnaire, and technical difficulties. In sum, these interviews suggest that electronic symptom assessments offer potential advantages in terms improving the integration of routine assessment of patients' symptoms and health-related quality of life into the daily flow of an oncology clinic. The approach should receive additional research and development attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783291     DOI: 10.1177/153303460800700508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  6 in total

1.  Refinement of anxiety sensitivity measurement: The Short Scale Anxiety Sensitivity Index (SSASI).

Authors:  Michael J Zvolensky; Lorra Garey; Thomas A Fergus; Matthew W Gallagher; Andres G Viana; Justin M Shepherd; Nubia A Mayorga; Lance P Kelley; Jackson O Griggs; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Improving hospice outcomes through systematic assessment: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Susan C McMillan; Brent J Small; William E Haley
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Development and validation of the Adherence to Asthma Medication Questionnaire (AAMQ).

Authors:  Razan I Nassar; Bandana Saini; Nathir M Obeidat; Iman A Basheti
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  The development and initial validation of the Fatigue Sensitivity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Brooke Y Kauffman; Lorra Garey; Alec Nordan; Charles Jardin; Nubia A Mayorga; Zuzuky Robles; Michael J Zvolensky
Journal:  Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2018-11-20

Review 5.  The past, present and future of opioid withdrawal assessment: a scoping review of scales and technologies.

Authors:  Joseph K Nuamah; Farzan Sasangohar; Madhav Erraguntla; Ranjana K Mehta
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Quality of Life Scales for Arabic-Speaking Adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammed Al Maqbali; Jackie Gracey; Jane Rankin; Lynn Dunwoody; Eileen Hacker; Ciara Hughes
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2020-06-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.