Literature DB >> 18783080

[Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a wise approach].

Achille Gaspardone1, Cesare Iani, Marco Papa.   

Abstract

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the normal fetal circulation consisting in a communication between septum primum and septum secundum. Postnatally, the two septa fuse completing separation of the atria. In 25% of normal individuals incomplete fusion leads to the persistence of the flap valve leaving a PFO. In the recent years a variety of clinical conditions has been associated with or attributed to PFO. In particular, PFO has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cryptogenic stroke/transient ischemic attack due to paradoxical embolism and to the pathogenesis of migraine headache. PFO has also been associated with decompression illness in divers and to minor diseases such as platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome and high-altitude pulmonary edema. Meta-analyses and observational studies indicate that the prevalence of PFO is approximately 3-fold higher in patients with cryptogenic stroke and migraineurs compared controls. Conversely, observational evidences indicate a 2-3-fold increased prevalence of migraine and cerebrovascular events in PFO carriers. Observational studies and meta-analyses suggest that, compared to optimal medical treatment, transcatheter closure of PFO might significantly reduce the recurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular events in patients with previous stroke/transient ischemic attack; however, albeit mechanical closure of PFO is an attractive alternative to medical therapy, randomized trials supporting the efficacy of this approach have not been completed. Furthermore, about 80% of patients undergoing PFO closure for nonmigraine indications reported improvement in their migraine symptoms. However, these studies were predominantly retrospective, nonrandomized and conducted in highly selected populations. The recently published MIST trial, the only randomized study available, failed to demonstrate a significant favorable effect of PFO closure for migraine resolution and/or migraine improvement. At present, as insufficient evidence exists to support transcatheter PFO closure for prevention of cryptogenic stroke recurrence as well as for migraine therapy, and considering that the procedure is not riskless (major complications occurring in 1.5-2% of patients whose PFO was closed), a very prudent and wise approach is imperative in individual patients when this therapeutic strategy is carried out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G Ital Cardiol (Rome)        ISSN: 1827-6806


  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive retrieval of patent foramen ovale closure device after device migration to the descending aorta.

Authors:  Abhijeet S Basoor; John F Cotant; Abdul R Halabi; Michele DeGregorio; Haroon Chughtai; Kiritkumar C Patel
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  Intermediate and long-term results of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale using the amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluder: one case of pulmonary embolism irrespective of patent foramen ovale closure.

Authors:  Ju Hee Yoon; Joon Sik Kim; Dae Hyung Lee; Eun Jung Shim; So Yeon Lee; Ki Sik Min; Do Jun Cho; Hye Ran Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Transient cerebral ischemia in an elderly patient with patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm.

Authors:  Alfonso Merante; Pietro Gareri; Alberto Castagna; Norma Maria Marigliano; Mafalda Candigliota; Alessandro Ferraro; Giovanni Ruotolo
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  How often is patent foramen ovale an innocent bystander?

Authors:  Francesco Versaci; Giampiero Vizzari; Domenico Sergi; Giuseppe Andò; Antonio Trivisonno; Francesco Romeo
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.