Literature DB >> 18782946

Overview of laser refractive surgery.

Samuel Chao-ming Huang1, Hung-Chi Jesse Chen.   

Abstract

Since approval of the use of the excimer laser in 1995 to reshape the cornea, significant developments in the correction of refractive errors such as myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism have been achieved. Combined with other advanced ophthalmological instruments (e.g. anterior segment imaging systems, the femtosecond laser, wavefront-guided customized ablation) and the knowledge accumulated concerning the basic science of refractive errors (e.g. biomechanics and wound healing of the cornea, higher-order aberrations), laser refractive surgery has promisingly outshone other conventional techniques (e.g. radial keratotomy [RK], automated lamellar keratectomy [ALK]) in terms of both safety and efficacy. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) produces stable and predictable results with a safe profile. Similarly, laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is also safe and efficacious with the additional advantages of rapid visual recovery and minimal postoperative pain. The choice between the two methods is made only after thoughtful discussion between the surgeon and the patient. Despite these advances, certain limitations and complications do exist. There are also specific and controversial circumstances for which studies should be conducted to make further breakthroughs and avoid annoying complications. In this review, the basic knowledge, surgical issues, and clinical outcomes, of laser refractive surgery, as well as complex cases, will be presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18782946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chang Gung Med J        ISSN: 2072-0939


  9 in total

1.  Influence of transient intraocular pressure elevation during laser in situ keratomileusis on rabbit retina thickness.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Zhao; Hui Liu; Chun-Mei Niu; Wen-Ying Guan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Photorefractive keratectomy in the correction of astigmatism using Schwind Amaris 750s laser.

Authors:  Okkes Baz; Necip Kara; Ercument Bozkurt; Engin Bilge Ozgurhan; Alper Agca; Kemal Yuksel; Yavuz Ozpinar; Ahmet Demirok
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Cataract surgery outcomes in eyes with previous radial keratotomy.

Authors:  Cristina Soare; Darshak S Patel; Alexander Ionides
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 4.  Epipolis-laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Bilateral Iris Atrophy after the Femtosecond Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Surgery.

Authors:  Kenan Olcay; Akin Cakir; Sercan Koray Sagdic; Eyup Duzgun; Yildiray Yildirim
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2015-06-14

6.  Comparison of microkeratome assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Talal A Althomali
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-29

7.  Comparative Study of Two Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses used as Bandage Contact Lenses after Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Authors:  Hasan Razmjoo; Elham Abdi; Sayna Atashkadi; Akhlaghi M Reza; Peyman A Reza; Mojtaba Akbari
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10

8.  Wavefront-guided versus cross-cylinder photorefractive keratectomy in moderate-to-high astigmatism: a cohort of two consecutive clinical trials.

Authors:  M R Sedghipour; R Sorkhabi; A Mostafaei
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-31

9.  Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.

Authors:  Ferial M Al-Zeraid; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.209

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.