BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is often multifocal and shows histological heterogeneity among different tumor foci within the same prostate. We analyzed the origin and molecular basis of multifocal prostate cancer and genomic alterations associated with tumor progression. METHODS: We examined 45 multifocal prostate cancer foci from 22 radical prostatectomy specimens by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used to gather cancer cells from frozen prostate specimens. RESULTS: Frequent chromosomal alternations were losses of 2q21-24 (22.2%), 6q14-22 (60.0%), 8p12-22 (35.6%), 13q14-31 (44.4%) and 16q13-24 (24.4%) and gains of 8q21.3-24.3 (37.8%) and 7q21-33 (20.0%). Frequency of losses of 8p12-22 and 16q13-24 and gains of 8q21.3-24.3 were significantly higher in tumors with high Gleason score (GS) than in those with low GS (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). Tumors with losses of 8p12-22 or 13q14-31 displayed larger volume than those without such losses (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). In comparison between different tumor foci within the same prostate, chromosomal alterations did not show completely the same pattern between any tumor foci, except for one case in which two of the three foci displayed no chromosomal abnormalities. More malignant tumors (high GS or extracapsular invasion) displayed significantly higher frequency of losses of 8p12-22 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that tumor foci within the same prostate represent independent tumors with differing clonal origin and that loss of 8p12-22 represents an important determinant of prostate cancer progression.
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer is often multifocal and shows histological heterogeneity among different tumor foci within the same prostate. We analyzed the origin and molecular basis of multifocal prostate cancer and genomic alterations associated with tumor progression. METHODS: We examined 45 multifocal prostate cancer foci from 22 radical prostatectomy specimens by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used to gather cancer cells from frozen prostate specimens. RESULTS: Frequent chromosomal alternations were losses of 2q21-24 (22.2%), 6q14-22 (60.0%), 8p12-22 (35.6%), 13q14-31 (44.4%) and 16q13-24 (24.4%) and gains of 8q21.3-24.3 (37.8%) and 7q21-33 (20.0%). Frequency of losses of 8p12-22 and 16q13-24 and gains of 8q21.3-24.3 were significantly higher in tumors with high Gleason score (GS) than in those with low GS (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). Tumors with losses of 8p12-22 or 13q14-31 displayed larger volume than those without such losses (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). In comparison between different tumor foci within the same prostate, chromosomal alterations did not show completely the same pattern between any tumor foci, except for one case in which two of the three foci displayed no chromosomal abnormalities. More malignant tumors (high GS or extracapsular invasion) displayed significantly higher frequency of losses of 8p12-22 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that tumor foci within the same prostate represent independent tumors with differing clonal origin and that loss of 8p12-22 represents an important determinant of prostate cancer progression.
Authors: Michael C Haffner; Wilbert Zwart; Martine P Roudier; Lawrence D True; William G Nelson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Adam G Sowalsky; Haydn T Kissick; Sean J Gerrin; Rachel J Schaefer; Zheng Xia; Joshua W Russo; M Simo Arredouani; Glenn J Bubley; Martin G Sanda; Wei Li; Huihui Ye; Steven P Balk Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Colin S Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David C Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Anne Y Warren; Christopher S Foster; Hayley C Whitaker; Ultan McDermott; Daniel S Brewer; David E Neal; Gunes Gundem; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Barbara Kremeyer; Adam Butler; Andrew G Lynch; Niedzica Camacho; Charlie E Massie; Jonathan Kay; Hayley J Luxton; Sandra Edwards; ZSofia Kote-Jarai; Nening Dennis; Sue Merson; Daniel Leongamornlert; Jorge Zamora; Cathy Corbishley; Sarah Thomas; Serena Nik-Zainal; Sarah O'Meara; Lucy Matthews; Jeremy Clark; Rachel Hurst; Richard Mithen; Robert G Bristow; Paul C Boutros; Michael Fraser; Susanna Cooke; Keiran Raine; David Jones; Andrew Menzies; Lucy Stebbings; Jon Hinton; Jon Teague; Stuart McLaren; Laura Mudie; Claire Hardy; Elizabeth Anderson; Olivia Joseph; Victoria Goody; Ben Robinson; Mark Maddison; Stephen Gamble; Christopher Greenman; Dan Berney; Steven Hazell; Naomi Livni; Cyril Fisher; Christopher Ogden; Pardeep Kumar; Alan Thompson; Christopher Woodhouse; David Nicol; Erik Mayer; Tim Dudderidge; Nimish C Shah; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Thierry Voet; Peter Campbell; Andrew Futreal; Douglas Easton; Michael R Stratton Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Hanneke Korsten; Angelique C J Ziel-van der Made; Wytske M van Weerden; Theo van der Kwast; Jan Trapman; Petra W Van Duijn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240