Literature DB >> 18781222

Management of neonatal testicular torsion: Which way to turn?

Luis A Guerra1, Joshua Wiesenthal, John Pike, Michael P Leonard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perinatal testicular torsion (PTT) is a rare event with controversies surrounding its etiology, prebsentation, surgical management and sequelae. Our survey assessed the preferences of pediatric urologists with regard to its management.
METHODS: Four cases of unilateral PTT and a questionnaire containing 11 questions about management of common clinical scenarios were mailed to 26 pediatric urologists. The answers were received anonymously and they were analyzed blindly.
RESULTS: The response rate was 80% (21/26), with 90% (19/21) of respondents holding academic appointments. In the 2 first cases of PTT with a typical unilateral nonviable testis, 76% (16/21) and 67% (14/21), respectively, opted for surgery. A case of acute postnatal torsion resulted in 100% agreement to urgent scrotal exploration. In the case of an atrophic testis, none of the respondents opted for immediate surgery; yet, 38% (8/21) said they would proceed with a delayed orchiopexy of the contralateral testicle. In the question section, 10% (2/21) responded that they preferred to explore PTT immediately; whereas, 57% (12/21) would delay surgical exploration for a few days until the neonate was better stabilized. One-third of participants (7/21) would not perform a surgical exploration but would just follow the child clinically. A scrotal incision for contralateral orchiopexy was preferred by 52% (11/21), while 48% (10/21) prefer a scrotal approach but would switch to an inguinal incision if a hydrocele were present. Operative intervention was favoured by 80% (8/10) and 46% (5/11) of those with less than and greater than 10 years of practice, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This survey revealed that 67% (14/21) of respondents preferred immediate exploration of a torted testis and contralateral orchiopexy, compared with the nonoperative approach. Scrotal incision for the exploration was preferred by most respondents. There was a trend to choose less aggressive treatment as the years of practice increase. Studies of more robust design, such as randomized controlled trials, are necessary to determine the natural history and outcomes of this uncommon type of testicular torsion.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18781222      PMCID: PMC2532558          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  16 in total

1.  Neonatal testicular torsion in two brothers.

Authors:  E E Castilla; R Sod; O Anzorena; J Texido
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Management of perinatal torsion: today, tomorrow or never?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Yerkes; Frank M Robertson; Jordan Gitlin; Martin Kaefer; Mark P Cain; Richard C Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Torsion of the spermatic cord in the newborn infant.

Authors:  M F CAMPBELL
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Controversies of perinatal torsion of the spermatic cord: a review, survey and recommendations.

Authors:  S Das; A Singer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Intrauterine bilateral torsion of the spermatic cord.

Authors:  M W Atallah; J J Ippolito; B W Rubin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Torsion of the spermatic cord in the newborn.

Authors:  H H Reeves; R M Sigler; H B Hahn; H B Lynn
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1965-12

7.  Bilateral spermatic cord torsion in the neonate.

Authors:  R Kay; D W Strong; E S Tank
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Torsion of the spermatic cord in utero.

Authors:  J Y Gillenwater; H M Burros
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Continuous regional anaesthesia in infants.

Authors:  J D Tobias; S Lowe; N O'Dell; J B Pietsch; W W Neblett
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Neonatal bilateral testicular torsion: a plea for emergency exploration.

Authors:  Maciej Baglaj; Robert Carachi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

1.  Perinatal testicular torsion.

Authors:  J L Pippi Salle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Neonatal testicular torsion: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Biplab Nandi; Feilim Liam Murphy
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Ultrasound assessment of perinatal testicular torsion.

Authors:  Huan Xiao; Yang Gao; Yingliang Li; Yi Tang; Lirong Zhu; Juan Xu; Fangting Mou; Yingle Huang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Contemporary review of testicular torsion: new concepts, emerging technologies and potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Daniel G DaJusta; Candace F Granberg; Carlos Villanueva; Linda A Baker
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Bilateral Neonatal Testicular Torsion; Hidden Surgical Nightmare.

Authors:  Tariq O Abbas; Mansour Ali
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  Neonatal testicular torsion.

Authors:  Ranjit I Kylat; Mohamed N Ahmed
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  New insights into perinatal testicular torsion.

Authors:  Piet R H Callewaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Ultrasonography of Extravaginal Testicular Torsion in Neonates.

Authors:  Przemysław Bombiński; Stanisław Warchoł; Michał Brzewski; Zofia Majkowska; Teresa Dudek-Warchoł; Maria Żerańska; Małgorzata Panek; Magdalena Drop
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.