| Literature DB >> 18781173 |
R Hennig1, T Osman, I Esposito, N Giese, S M Rao, X-Z Ding, W-G Tong, M W Büchler, T Yokomizo, H Friess, T E Adrian.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has an abysmal prognosis. Targets for early detection, prevention and therapy are desperately needed. Inflammatory pathways have an important impact on tumour growth and progression. Expression of BLT2 (the second leukotriene B(4) receptor) was investigated by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Cell proliferation was studied after stable transfection with BLT2, after treatment with siRNA and Compound A as an agonist. BLT2 is expressed in all pancreatic cancer cell lines. Results from real-time RT-PCR revealed significant overexpression of BLT2 in malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias (IPMNs) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intense staining was evident in IPMNs, infiltrating tumour cells and advanced pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) but not in normal ductal cells. Overexpression of BLT2 as well as stimulation of Colo357, Panc-1 and AsPC1 cells with Compound A caused a significant increase in tumour cell proliferation, an effect reversed after siRNA treatment. This study demonstrates for the first time the expression of BLT2 in the pancreas and overexpression in pancreatic cancers and malignant IPMNs in particular. Upregulation of BLT2 is already evident in precursor lesions (PanINs, IPMNs). Overexpression of this receptor leads to significant growth stimulation. Therefore, we suggest BLT2 as a new target for chemoprevention and therapy for pancreatic cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18781173 PMCID: PMC2567081 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Immunohistochemistry for BLT2 in pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 1 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | + |
| 2 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | + |
| 3 | Negative | 1a: negative | Absent | Negative | + |
| 4 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | + |
| 5 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | + |
| 6 | Negative | Absent | Absent | + | + |
| 7 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | Negative |
| 8 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | + |
| 9 | Negative | Absent | Absent | + | + |
| 10 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | Negative |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Negative | 1b: +++ | Absent | +++ | + |
| 2 | Negative | Absent | Absent | + | Negative |
| 3 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | Absent |
| 4 | Negative | Absent | Absent | + | Negative |
| 5 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | Negative |
| 6 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | Negative |
| 7 | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | Negative |
| 8 | Negative | 1a: negative | Absent | + | + |
| 9 | Negative | 1a: negative; 1b: ++ | Absent | Negative | Negative |
| 10 | Negative | 1a: negative | Absent | + | Negative |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Absent | 3: +++ | ++ | Negative | + |
| 2 | Negative | 3: +++ | ++ | Negative | + |
| 3 | Negative | 1b, 2, 3: +++ | ++ | Absent | Absent |
| 4 | Negative | Absent | +++ | Negative | Negative |
| 5 | Absent | 1a: negative, 1b: ++ | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| 6 | Negative | Absent | +++ | Negative | Negative |
| 7 | Negative | 2: +++ | Absent | Negative | + |
| 8 | Negative | 2, 3: +++ | +++ | Negative | + |
| 9 | Negative | 2, 3: +++ | +++ | Negative | Negative |
| 10 | Negative | 2, 3: +++ | +++ | Negative | Negative |
| Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA | No difference | No difference | No difference | ||
| Normal | |||||
| Normal | |||||
| CP | |||||
c.d.=cadaver donor; CP=chronic pancreatitis; PC=pancreatic cancer.On account of the multiple groups, statistical analysis in the human samples was carried out by Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn's method as post hoc test for multiple comparisons. PanIN: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1a, 1b, 2 and 3.
Absent: described structures are not present in this tissue section.
Negative: unstained but present structures.
‘+’ Weak positive staining.
‘++’ Positive staining.
‘+++’ Strong positive staining.
Figure 1Immunohistochemical localisation of BLT2 in human pancreatic tissues. A–I shows normal pancreatic tissues obtained from multi-organ donors, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma stained by the AP-Red system. K–P demonstrates staining in IPMN tissues using the DAB system. (A) unstained duct in normal pancreas (× 400); (B) unstained PanIN-1a lesion in normal pancreas (× 400); (C) unstained ducts in chronic pancreatitis and basal staining in some acinar cells (× 400). (D) PanIN-2 lesion in chronic pancreatitis with positive staining in the cytoplasm (× 200); (E) and (F) PanIN-3 lesion in pancreatic cancer with intense cytoplasmic staining (× 200, × 400); (G) unstained PanIN-3 lesion in an adjacent section to (F) but in the presence of the blocking peptide to quench the staining (× 400); (H) infiltrating tumour cells in pancreatic cancer with marked positive staining in the cytoplasm (× 400); (I) positive-stained tumour cells in a lymph node metastasis (× 400); (K) unstained normal duct next to an IPMN adenoma (× 200); intense cytoplasmic staining is shown in (L) IPMN adenoma branch duct type (× 100), (M) main duct type (× 400), (N) borderline IPMN of the oncocytic type (× 200), and in malignant invasive IPMNs of the (O) tubular (× 200) and (P) colloid type (× 400). The primary antibody to BLT2 was used at 1 : 50 on deparaffinised tissues.
Immunohistochemistry for BLT2 in IPMNs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 1 | + | + | Absent | Negative | Negative |
| 2 | + | +++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 3 | + | +++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 4 | Negative | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 5 | + | +++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 6 | + | +++ | Absent | ++ | Negative |
| 7 | ++ | ++ | Absent | ++ | Negative |
|
| |||||
| 1 | + | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 2 | + | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 3 | + | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 4 | + | +++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 5 | ++ | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 6 | + | + | Absent | + | Negative |
| 7 | ++ | +++ | Absent | ++ | Negative |
| 8 | + | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 9 | + | +++ | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| 10 | + | +++ | Absent | + | Absent |
| 11 | + | ++ | Absent | + | Negative |
| 12 | ++ | +++ | Absent | + | Negative |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Absent | ++ | ++ | Absent | Absent |
| 2 | Absent | +++ | +++ | Absent | Absent |
| 3 | Absent | +++ | +++ | Absent | Absent |
| 4 | + | +++ | +++ | + | Absent |
| 5 | + | +++ | +++ | + | Negative |
| 6 | Absent | ++ | ++ | Absent | Absent |
| 7 | Absent | ++ | ++ | Absent | Absent |
| 8 | Absent | ++ | ++ | Absent | Absent |
| 9 | Absent | Negative | Negative | Absent | Absent |
| Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA | No difference | No difference | No difference | ||
| Adenoma | |||||
| Adenoma | |||||
| Borderline | |||||
IPMN=intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia.
On account of the multiple groups, statistical analysis in the human samples was carried out by Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn's method as post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Absent: described structures are not present in this tissue section.
Negative: unstained but present structures.
‘+’ Weak positive staining.
‘++’ Positive staining.
‘+++’ Strong positive staining.
Figure 2Expression of BLT1 and BLT2 on mRNA level in human pancreatic tissues using real-time RT–PCR (NP=normal pancreas obtained from multi-organ donors, CP=chronic pancreatitis, PC=pancreatic adenocarcinoma, IPMN=intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia). (A) shows BLT1 expression in CP and PC; (B) shows BLT2 in CP and PC; (C) shows BLT1 in IPMNs and (D) shows BLT2 in IPMNs. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 3Expression of BLT1 and BLT2 on mRNA level in pancreatic cancer cell lines using real-time RT–PCR.
Figure 4The effect of overexpression of BLT2 in Panc-1 (A), Colo357 (B) and AsPC-1 (C) cells on proliferation of these cells, evaluated by cell counting over 96 and 120 h. Significant growth stimulation is shown for BLT2-transfected cells compared with Mock and fMLPR (P<0.001). Reversibility of this effect after siRNA transfection is demonstrated for Panc-1 cells by cell counting over 120 h (D). (P<0.001 for BLT2 siRNA sc vs BLT2 siRNA BLT2 and BLT2 siRNA sc vs fMLPR).
Figure 5Treatment with LTB4 (BLT1 and BLT2 agonist) or Compound A (selective BLT2 agonist) significantly increased proliferation of Panc-1 and Colo357 cells dose (over 48 h; *P<0.05; **P<0.01) and time dependently (at 1000 nM; P<0.001 for LTB4 and Compound A vs Compound B). Compound B is a methyl ester and served as negative control. Dose-dependent effects are shown in (A) and time-dependent effects in (B) and (C). Panel (D) demonstrates significant growth inhibition of Panc-1 cells (not overexpressing BLT2) by BLT2 siRNA when BLT2 is stimulated with Compound A. The black arrow marks when siRNA was added.