Literature DB >> 18780808

Efficacy of an adverse drug reaction electronic reporting system integrated into a hospital information system.

Ana Ortega1, Aránzazu Aguinagalde, Carlos Lacasa, Irene Aquerreta, Margarita Fernández-Benítez, Luis M Fernández.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) spontaneous reporting is the primary method of postmarketing drug surveillance; although it is an important part of postmarketing drug surveillance, it is underused. Before 2004, almost no ADRs were reported in our 400-bed hospital. As an electronic hospital information system was available in our hospital, we developed a tool (ADR-RS-IHIS) for ADR reporting integrated into the hospital information system to facilitate reporting through easy use, automatic input of certain information, increased accessibility, real-time review, and intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of the ADR-RS-IHIS in increasing ADR reporting to the national drug surveillance system, propose and implement improvements to increase ADR reporting, and evaluate the impact of these improvements.
METHODS: Every ADR reported through the ADR-RS-IHIS was evaluated retrospectively. Two study phases for evaluating ADR-RS-IHIS efficacy were identified. Phase I took place April 2004-August 2006; in April 2006, an interim analysis was performed to propose improvements. Phase II took place September 2006-April 2007 for evaluation of the impact made by the proposed improvements. Efficacy in the phase I and improvement impact on phase II were measured as the number of ADRs reported to the national drug surveillance system.
RESULTS: The rate of ADRs reported per month to the national system increased from 0 before 2004 to 0.91 in phase I and 1.62 in phase II (2.25 if delayed reporting was considered). Improvement measures included: allowing nurses to report ADRs in the same way as physicians and pharmacists, automatic form filling of certain information from the electronic hospital information system, easier ADR report analysis, and automatic notification to the allergy department regarding suspected allergies.
CONCLUSIONS: An ADR reporting system integrated into the electronic hospital information system is effective for increasing the number of ADRs reported to the national drug surveillance system. Allowing nurses to report ADRs in a manner similar to that of physicians and pharmacists, as well as automatic entry of certain data into the form, contributes to the improvement of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18780808     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1L130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacovigilance in pediatrics: current challenges.

Authors:  Antje Neubert
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Strategies to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Cristian Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Elena Lopez-Gonzalez; Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Barriers to the success of an electronic pharmacovigilance reporting system in Kenya: an evaluation three years post implementation.

Authors:  Oscar O Agoro; Sarah W Kibira; Jenny V Freeman; Hamish S F Fraser
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Promoting spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in hospitals using a hyperlink to the online reporting form: an ecological study in Portugal.

Authors:  Inês Ribeiro-Vaz; Cristina Santos; Altamiro da Costa-Pereira; Ricardo Cruz-Correia
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Effect of an intervention on the features of adverse drug reactions spontaneously reported in a hospital.

Authors:  Gloria Cereza; Antonia Agustí; Consuelo Pedrós; Antonio Vallano; Cristina Aguilera; Immaculada Danés; Xavier Vidal; Josep Maria Arnau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  General medications utilization and cost patterns in hospitalized children.

Authors:  Doaa Okasha; Imad Kassis; Salim Haddad; Norberto Krivoy
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2009-03-15

Review 7.  How to promote adverse drug reaction reports using information systems - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Inês Ribeiro-Vaz; Ana-Marta Silva; Cristina Costa Santos; Ricardo Cruz-Correia
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Pharmacovigilance: pharmacists' perspective on spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting.

Authors:  Muhammad Abdul Hadi; Chin Fen Neoh; Rosdi M Zin; Mahmoud E Elrggal; Ejaz Cheema
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-22

9.  Evaluation of the adverse drug reaction surveillance system Kadoma City, Zimbabwe 2015.

Authors:  Caroline Muringazuva; Daniel Chirundu; More Mungati; Gerald Shambira; Notion Gombe; Donewell Bangure; Tsitsi Juru; Mufuta Tshimanga
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-05-24

10.  Choosing Appropriate Theories for Understanding Hospital Reporting of Adverse Drug Events, a Theoretical Domains Framework Approach.

Authors:  Gloria Shalviri; Bahareh Yazdizadeh; Fariba Mirbaha; Kheirollah Gholami; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.