BACKGROUND: The evaluation of residual disease (RD) after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma conventionally is based on a clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 3 to 8 weeks after the end of treatment. Very few studies have correlated MRI and histologic findings specifically in cervix cancer. This was the objective of the current study. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: 1) stage IB2/II cervical cancer, 2) external radiotherapy (45 grays [Gy]) was given with concomitant chemotherapy followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy (15 Gy), 3) MRI studies were obtained between 3 weeks and 8 weeks after brachytherapy, and 4) completion surgery included at least a hysterectomy. Postsurgical histologic findings and MRI results were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four patients who were treated between 2003 and 2006 fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Twelve patients (27%) had achieved a radiologic complete response, 16 patients (36.5%) had unclassified lesions (RD or 'fibrosis'), and 16 patients (36.5%) had radiologic residual tumor. According to the histologic results, 19 patients (43%) had no RD, 10 patients (23%) had inframillimeter RD, 2 patients (5%) had RD that measured <1 cm, and 13 patients (29%) had RD that measured >1 cm. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in evaluating RD were 80% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that the evaluation of RD 3 to 8 weeks after CRT with MRI is difficult, and the risk of false-positive results is high. Another radiologic procedure or a more technologically advanced MRI technique, such as diffusion-weighted MRI, should be evaluated. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of residual disease (RD) after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma conventionally is based on a clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 3 to 8 weeks after the end of treatment. Very few studies have correlated MRI and histologic findings specifically in cervix cancer. This was the objective of the current study. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: 1) stage IB2/II cervical cancer, 2) external radiotherapy (45 grays [Gy]) was given with concomitant chemotherapy followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy (15 Gy), 3) MRI studies were obtained between 3 weeks and 8 weeks after brachytherapy, and 4) completion surgery included at least a hysterectomy. Postsurgical histologic findings and MRI results were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four patients who were treated between 2003 and 2006 fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Twelve patients (27%) had achieved a radiologic complete response, 16 patients (36.5%) had unclassified lesions (RD or 'fibrosis'), and 16 patients (36.5%) had radiologic residual tumor. According to the histologic results, 19 patients (43%) had no RD, 10 patients (23%) had inframillimeter RD, 2 patients (5%) had RD that measured <1 cm, and 13 patients (29%) had RD that measured >1 cm. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in evaluating RD were 80% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that the evaluation of RD 3 to 8 weeks after CRT with MRI is difficult, and the risk of false-positive results is high. Another radiologic procedure or a more technologically advanced MRI technique, such as diffusion-weighted MRI, should be evaluated. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Yulia Lakhman; Stephanie Nougaret; Maura Miccò; Chiara Scelzo; Hebert A Vargas; Ramon E Sosa; Elizabeth J Sutton; Dennis S Chi; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala Journal: Radiographics Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Philippe Morice; Philippe Rouanet; Annie Rey; Pascale Romestaing; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Jean Charles Boulanger; Jean Leveque; Didier Cowen; Patrice Mathevet; Jean Pierre Malhaire; Guillaume Magnin; Eric Fondrinier; Jocelyne Berille; Christine Haie-Meder Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-01-10
Authors: M P Schmid; B Mansmann; M Federico; J C A Dimopoulous; P Georg; E Fidarova; W Dörr; R Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Nina A Mayr; Jian Z Wang; Simon S Lo; Dongqing Zhang; John C Grecula; Lanchun Lu; Joseph F Montebello; Jeffrey M Fowler; William T C Yuh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 7.038