Literature DB >> 18780311

Parallels between the development of therapeutic drugs and cancer health disparity programs: implications for Disparities Reduction.

Kenneth C Chu1, Moon S Chen, Mark B Dignan, Emmanuel Taylor, Edward Partridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are analogies between the development of therapeutic drugs for cancer and the development of interventions for reducing cancer health disparities. In both cases, it can take between 12 and 15 years for the benefits to become apparent.
METHODS: The initial preclinical phase of drug development is analogous to the development of community partnerships and helping the community learn about cancer. The preclinical phase of in vitro and in vivo testing is analogous to identifying the disparities in the community. Then clinical testing begins with phase 1, toxicity, and dose-establishing studies. Analogously, community-based participatory research is used to develop disparities-reducing interventions (DRIs) within the community.
RESULTS: The phase 2 clinical studies to determine whether the drug has activity are analogous to the DRI being implemented in the community to determine whether it can cause behavioral changes that will reduce cancer health disparities. If a drug passes phase 1 and 2 studies, phase 3 clinical trials are initiated. These are controlled studies to examine the efficacy of the drug. The similar activity for disparities research is to determine whether the DRI is better than the current standard/usual practice in controlled trials. If the drug is beneficial, the final phase is the dissemination and adoption of the drug. Analogously in disparities, if the DRI is beneficial, it is disseminated and is culturally adapted to other racial/ethnic groups and finally adopted as standard practice.
CONCLUSIONS: The process of creating an effective DRI can be envisioned to have 4 stages, which can be used to aid in measuring the progress being made in reducing cancer health disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18780311      PMCID: PMC4360960          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Special Populations Networks--how this innovative community-based initiative affected minority and underserved research programs.

Authors:  Frank E Jackson; Kenneth C Chu; Roland Garcia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Reflections on programs designed to reduce cancer disparities.

Authors:  M Alfred Haynes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The role of the Special Populations Networks program in eliminating cancer health disparities.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman; Nadarajen A Vydelingum
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates.

Authors:  K C Chu; R E Tarone; L G Kessler; L A Ries; B F Hankey; B A Miller; B K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-11-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast cancer trends of black women compared with white women.

Authors:  K C Chu; R E Tarone; O W Brawley
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

6.  The new emphasis in cancer control.

Authors:  P Greenwald; J W Cullen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 13.506

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Claudia X Aguado Loi; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Enmanuel A Chavarria; Liliana Gutierrez; Lynne Klasko; Stacy Davis; Diana Lopez; Tracy Johns; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  The Asian American Network for Cancer Awareness, Research, and Training (AANCART)'s contributions toward reducing Asian American cancer health disparities, 2000-2017.

Authors:  Moon S Chen; Edward A Chow; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  USING SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING OF A REGIONAL COMMUNITY CANCER NETWORK.

Authors:  John Luque; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Ji-Hyun Lee; Clement Gwede; Susan Vadaparampil; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Cathy Meade
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion.

Authors:  Cathy D Meade; Janelle M Menard; John S Luque; Dinorah Martinez-Tyson; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-10-12

5.  The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Susan Stewart; Claudia Baquet; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Daniel Blumenthal; Heather M Brandt; Dedra S Buchwald; Janis E Campbell; Kathryn Coe; Leslie C Cooper; Paula Espinoza; Ronda Henry-Tillman; Margaret Hargreaves; Aimee James; Judith Salmon Kaur; K Viswanath; Grace X Ma; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Cathy Meade; Amelie Ramirez; Isabel Scarinci; Sora Park Tanjasiri; Beti Thompson; Anissa I Vines; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.