Literature DB >> 18780255

An evaluation of the 10-item vision core measure 1 (VCM1) scale (the Core Module of the Vision-Related Quality of Life scale) using Rasch analysis.

Ecosse L Lamoureux1, Konrad Pesudovs, Julie F Pallant, Gwyn Rees, Jennifer B Hassell, Lynda E Caudle, Jill E Keeffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and re-engineer the Vision Core Measure 1 (VCM1) questionnaire in low vision (LV) and cataract participants using Rasch analysis.
METHODS: 295 participants drawn from a low vision clinic and 181 from a cataract surgery waiting list completed the 10-item VCM1. Unidimensionality, item fit to the model, response category performance, differential item functioning (DIF) and targeting of items to patients were assessed. Category collapsing and item removal were considered to improve the questionnaire.
RESULTS: The initial fit of the VCM1 (combined populations) to the Rasch model showed lack of fit (chi2 = 83.3, df = 50, p = 0.002). There was evidence of DIF between the two populations which could not be resolved. Consequently, each population was assessed separately. Irrespective of the population, disordering of response category thresholds was evident. However, collapsing categories produced ordered thresholds and resulted in fit to the Rasch model for the LV (Total chi2 = 41.6, df = 30; p = 0.08) and cataract population (Total chi2 = 17.9, df = 20, p = 0.59). Overall, the VCM1 behaved as a unidimensional scale for each population and no item showed evidence of DIF. Item targeting to patients was however sub-optimal particularly for the cataract population.
CONCLUSION: The VCM1 questionnaire could be improved by shortening the response scale, although different response categories are required for cataract and LV populations. Calibration of items also differed across populations. While the VCM1 performs well within the Rasch model, in line with its initial purpose, it requires the addition of items to satisfactorily target low vision and cataract populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18780255     DOI: 10.1080/09286580802256559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol        ISSN: 0928-6586            Impact factor:   1.648


  8 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Steven Tally; Chris W Heichel; Igor Kozak; Jennifer Leich; Ashley Levack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Re-evaluating a vision-related quality of life questionnaire with item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses.

Authors:  Ruth M A van Nispen; Dirk L Knol; Maaike Langelaan; Ger H M B van Rens
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren R Hepworth; Fiona J Rowe; Robert Harper; Kathryn Jarvis; Tracey Shipman; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Measuring coping in parents of children with disabilities: a rasch model approach.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Seelam Bharani; Shailaja P Reddy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An alternative application of Rasch analysis to assess data from ophthalmic patient-reported outcome instruments.

Authors:  Richard N McNeely; Salissou Moutari; Samuel Arba-Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  D Starnoni; C Tuleasca; L Giammattei; G Cossu; M Bruneau; M Berhouma; J F Cornelius; L Cavallo; S Froelich; E Jouanneau; T R Meling; D Paraskevopoulos; H Schroeder; M Tatagiba; I Zazpe; A Sufianov; M E Sughrue; Ari G Chacko; V Benes; P González-Lopez; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy T Daniel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Everyday visual demands of people with low vision: A mixed methods real-life recording study.

Authors:  Sandra D Starke; Eugenie Golubova; Michael D Crossland; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.