Literature DB >> 18779580

Stage-specific predator species help each other to persist while competing for a single prey.

A M De Roos1, T Schellekens, T Van Kooten, L Persson.   

Abstract

Prey in natural communities are usually shared by many predator species. How predators coexist while competing for the same prey is one of the fundamental questions in ecology. Here, we show that competing predator species may not only coexist on a single prey but even help each other to persist if they specialize on different life history stages of the prey. By changing the prey size distribution, a predator species may in fact increase the amount of prey available for its competitor. Surprisingly, a predator may not be able to persist at all unless its competitor is also present. The competitor thus significantly increases the range of conditions for which a particular predator can persist. This "emergent facilitation" is a long-term, population-level effect that results from asymmetric increases in the rate of prey maturation and reproduction when predation relaxes competition among prey. Emergent facilitation explains observations of correlated increases of predators on small and large conspecific prey as well as concordance in their distribution patterns. Our results suggest that emergent facilitation may promote the occurrence of complex, stable, community food webs and that persistence of these communities could critically depend on diversity within predator guilds.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18779580      PMCID: PMC2532698          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803834105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate.

Authors:  J F Gillooly; J H Brown; G B West; V M Savage; E L Charnov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Size-dependent life-history traits promote catastrophic collapses of top predators.

Authors:  André M De Roos; Lennart Persson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Culling prey promotes predator recovery--alternative states in a whole-lake experiment.

Authors:  Lennart Persson; Per-Arne Amundsen; André M De Roos; Anders Klemetsen; Rune Knudsen; Raul Primicerio
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Food-dependent growth leads to overcompensation in stage-specific biomass when mortality increases: the influence of maturation versus reproduction regulation.

Authors:  Andre M De Roos; Tim Schellekens; Tobias van Kooten; Karen van de Wolfshaar; David Claessen; Lennart Persson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

Authors:  J L Brooks; S I Dodson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Simplifying a physiologically structured population model to a stage-structured biomass model.

Authors:  André M De Roos; Tim Schellekens; Tobias Van Kooten; Karen Van De Wolfshaar; David Claessen; Lennart Persson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Dynamic energy budget theory and population ecology: lessons from Daphnia.

Authors:  Roger M Nisbet; Edward McCauley; Leah R Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Culling experiments demonstrate size-class specific biomass increases with mortality.

Authors:  A Schröder; L Persson; A M de Roos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pathogens trigger top-down climate forcing on ecosystem dynamics.

Authors:  Eric Edeline; Andreas Groth; Bernard Cazelles; David Claessen; Ian J Winfield; Jan Ohlberger; L Asbjørn Vøllestad; Nils C Stenseth; Michael Ghil
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Damped trophic cascades driven by fishing in model marine ecosystems.

Authors:  K H Andersen; M Pedersen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolutionary contribution to coexistence of competitors in microbial food webs.

Authors:  Teppo Hiltunen; Veijo Kaitala; Jouni Laakso; Lutz Becks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sudden collapse of a mesopredator reveals its complementary role in mediating rocky reef regime shifts.

Authors:  Jenn M Burt; M Tim Tinker; Daniel K Okamoto; Kyle W Demes; Keith Holmes; Anne K Salomon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Antagonistic selection from predators and pathogens alters food-web structure.

Authors:  Eric Edeline; Tamara Ben Ari; L Asbjørn Vøllestad; Ian J Winfield; Janice M Fletcher; J Ben James; Nils C Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Consequences of the size structure of fish populations for their effects on a generalist avian predator.

Authors:  Janusz Kloskowski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Who eats whom in a pool? A comparative study of prey selectivity by predatory aquatic insects.

Authors:  Jan Klecka; David S Boukal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ontogenetic asymmetry modulates population biomass production and response to harvest.

Authors:  Birte Reichstein; Lennart Persson; André M De Roos
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.