Literature DB >> 18779547

Accuracy of primary care clinicians in screening for diabetic retinopathy using single-image retinal photography.

Tillman F Farley1, Naresh Mandava, F Ryan Prall, Cece Carsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diabetic patients with limited access to ophthalmologists have low screening rates for diabetic retinopathy. We evaluated a diabetic retinopathy screening program in a community health center using single images taken with a nonmydriatic retinal camera and primary care clinicians trained to read retinal images.
METHODS: This study was conducted from 2001 to 2004 in a multisite community health center staffed by family physicians, advanced practice nurses, and physician's assistants. The clinic serves a primarily low-income, Hispanic population. Clinic clinicians were trained to read the retinal photographs. All images were overread by an ophthalmologist. Patients were referred to eye care specialists for severe diabetic retinopathy, unknown or other abnormality, or inadequate photographs. We analyzed agreement between the clinicians and the ophthalmologist in recognizing diabetic retinopathy and in determining which patients needed referral. We also analyzed overall screening rates based on clinic access to the camera.
RESULTS: One thousand forty diabetic patients were screened for diabetic retinopathy at the health center. One hundred thirteen (10.9%) were found to have diabetic retinopathy, 46 severe enough to warrant referral to an ophthalmologist. The clinicians failed to refer 35 (10.2%) of the 344 patients the ophthalmologist believed needed referral. Most cases of missed referral were due to failure to recognize an inadequate photograph or for abnormalities other than diabetic retinopathy. Screening rates were better in the clinic with a permanent camera.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care clinicians trained to read single images from a retinal camera have acceptable accuracy in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Further training may be necessary to recognize other common abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18779547      PMCID: PMC2532778          DOI: 10.1370/afm.857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  28 in total

1.  Determinants of regular source of health care in black, Mexican, Puerto Rican, and non-Hispanic white populations.

Authors:  N Lewin-Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Delayed diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in black and Hispanic patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A P Appiah; R Ganthier; N Watkins
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-04

4.  Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998.

Authors:  A H Mokdad; E S Ford; B A Bowman; D E Nelson; M M Engelgau; F Vinicor; J S Marks
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging technology: the Vine Hill study.

Authors:  Cathy R Taylor; Lawrence M Merin; Amy M Salunga; Joseph T Hepworth; Terri D Crutcher; Denis M O'Day; Bonita A Pilon
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Fundus polaroid screening for diabetic retinopathy. Is one print per patient enough?

Authors:  E Chantelau; M Zwecker; H Weiss; G Kluxen; M Berger
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Diabetic retinopathy study. Report Number 6. Design, methods, and baseline results. Report Number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Accuracy of screening for diabetic retinopathy by family physicians.

Authors:  James M Gill; David M Cole; Harry M Lebowitz; James J Diamond
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in adult Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino eye study.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Mina Torres; Fernando Peña; Ronald Klein; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods.

Authors:  M J Buxton; M J Sculpher; B A Ferguson; J E Humphreys; J F Altman; D J Spiegelhalter; A J Kirby; J S Jacob; H Bacon; S B Dudbridge
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  14 in total

1.  In this issue: access to care, spirituality, and relevant research.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Clinical Components of Telemedicine Programs for Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Mark B Horton; Paolo S Silva; Jerry D Cavallerano; Lloyd Paul Aiello
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Analysis of foveal avascular zone for grading of diabetic retinopathy severity based on curvelet transform.

Authors:  Shirin Hajeb Mohammad Alipour; Hossein Rabbani; Mohammadreza Akhlaghi; Alireza Mehri Dehnavi; Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Importance of telemedicine in diabetes care: Relationships between family physicians and ophthalmologists.

Authors:  Pedro Romero-Aroca; Ramon Sagarra-Alamo; Alicia Pareja-Rios; Maribel López
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-07-25

5.  No loss of chance of diabetic retinopathy screening by endocrinologists with a digital fundus camera.

Authors:  Natacha Germain; Bodgan Galusca; Nilanjana Deb-Joardar; Luc Millot; Pierre Manoli; Gilles Thuret; Philippe Gain; Bruno Estour
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Intra- and inter-rater agreement between an ophthalmologist and mid-level ophthalmic personnel to diagnose retinal diseases based on fundus photographs at a primary eye center in Nepal: the Bhaktapur Retina Study.

Authors:  Raba Thapa; Sanyam Bajimaya; Renske Bouman; Govinda Paudyal; Shankar Khanal; Stevie Tan; Suman S Thapa; Ger van Rens
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  Immune system and melanoma biology: a balance between immunosurveillance and immune escape.

Authors:  Anna Passarelli; Francesco Mannavola; Luigia Stefania Stucci; Marco Tucci; Francesco Silvestris
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-31

8.  Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Pritam Bawankar; Nita Shanbhag; S Smitha K; Bodhraj Dhawan; Aratee Palsule; Devesh Kumar; Shailja Chandel; Suneet Sood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Retinopathy among young adults with Diabetes Mellitus from a tertiary care setting in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Prasad Katulanda; Yasindu C Waniganayake; Priyanga Ranasinghe; Wm Udai Akalanka Wijetunga; Mahesh Jayaweera; Nishantha P Wijesinghe; Rezvi Sheriff; David R Matthews
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.763

10.  Development and Validation of a Diabetic Retinopathy Referral Algorithm Based on Single-Field Fundus Photography.

Authors:  Sangeetha Srinivasan; Sharan Shetty; Viswanathan Natarajan; Tarun Sharma; Rajiv Raman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.