Literature DB >> 18779487

Evaluation of intraocular and orbital pressure in the management of orbital hemorrhage: an experimental model.

Christopher I Zoumalan1, John D Bullock, Ronald E Warwar, Barry Fuller, Timothy J McCulley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate orbital pressure (OP), intraocular pressure (IOP), and the effectiveness of canthotomy, cantholysis, and septolysis using an experimental orbital hemorrhage model.
METHODS: Expired whole blood was injected into the retrobulbar space of 10 human cadaver orbits. At 1-mL increments, OP, IOP, and globe position were documented. The mean (SD) time interval between the injections was 84 (36) seconds. Following injection of 22 mL, lateral canthotomy, cantholysis, and septolysis were performed. An additional 10 mL of blood was then injected.
RESULTS: After injecting 22 mL of whole blood, mean (SD) OP and IOP were 68.4 (32.2) and 71.5 (19.1) mm Hg, respectively. The OP and IOP correlated closely throughout the experiment, with a mean (SD) difference of 11.4 (4.9) mm Hg (Pearson coefficient, 0.97). Following canthotomy, cantholysis, and septolysis, there was a mean (SD) decrease of 48.0 (27.2) mm Hg (70%) and 50.0 (18.1) mm Hg (59%) in OP and IOP, respectively. With additional injection of 10 mL of blood, OP and IOP increased rapidly.
CONCLUSIONS: The IOP and OP rose in direct proportion to the volume of whole blood injected; OP lagged behind IOP by 11 mm Hg, and surgical release of the orbit reduced OP by 70%. This effect was short-lived in the setting of continued simulated hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18779487     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.9.1257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  7 in total

1.  Inferior orbital septum release compared with lateral canthotomy and cantholysis in the management of orbital compartment syndrome.

Authors:  Alan E Oester; Brian T Fowler; James C Fleming
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  Orbital compartment: effects of emergent canthotomy and cantholysis.

Authors:  Frank Haubner; Herbert Jägle; Diogo Pereira Nunes; Stephan Schleder; Nadezha Cvetkova; Thomas Kühnel; Holger G Gassner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  Minimally invasive measurement of orbital compartment pressure and implications for orbital compartment syndrome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tim J Enz; Anthia Papazoglou; Christoph Tappeiner; Marcel N Menke; Benito K Benitez; Markus Tschopp
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Acute orbital compartment syndrome due to traumatic hemorrhage: 4-year case series and relevant literature review with emphasis on its management.

Authors:  Papadiochos I; Petsinis V; Sarivalasis S-E; Strantzias P; Bourazani M; Goutzanis L; Tampouris A
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 6.  Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Tim J Enz; Markus Tschopp
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

7.  Orbital compartment syndrome: Pearls and pitfalls for the emergency physician.

Authors:  Shyam Murali; Courtney Davis; Michael J McCrea; Michael C Plewa
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-03-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.