Literature DB >> 18779354

Development, stability, and molecular mechanisms of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni.

Dave Bryson Caldwell1, Ying Wang, Jun Lin.   

Abstract

Previous studies of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter were primarily focused on strains from various origins or used in vitro systems. In this study, we conducted both in vitro and in vivo experiments to examine the development, stability, and genetic basis of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni using erythromycin-resistant (Ery(r)) mutants derived from the same parent strain. Chickens inoculated with low-level Ery(r) mutants (MIC = 32 or 64 microg/ml) at 15 days old did not shed highly Ery(r) mutants (MIC > 512 microg/ml) after prolonged exposure to a low dose of tylosin. The low-level Ery resistance was not stable in vitro or in vivo in the absence of macrolide selection pressure. However, high-level Ery resistance displayed remarkable stability in vitro and in vivo. Ribosomal sequence analysis of 69 selected Ery(r) mutants showed that specific point mutations (A2074G or A2074C) occurred in all highly Ery(r) mutants. No mutations in ribosomal protein L4 were observed in any of the in vitro-selected Ery(r) mutants. However, three specific mutations in L4, G74D, G57D, and G57V, were widely found among in vivo-selected Ery(r) mutants. Insertion of three amino acids, TSH, at position 98 in ribosomal protein L22 was observed only in mutants selected in vitro. Inactivation of the CmeABC efflux pump dramatically reduced Ery MICs in Ery(r) mutants. Together, these findings suggest that multiple factors contribute to the emergence of highly Ery(r) Campylobacter in chicken, reveal resistance level-dependent stability of macrolide resistance in C. jejuni, and indicate that C. jejuni utilizes complex and different mechanisms to develop Ery resistance in vitro and in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18779354      PMCID: PMC2573100          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00450-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

Review 1.  The biological cost of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  D I Andersson; B R Levin
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Macrolide resistance in Campylobacter coli of animal origin in Denmark.

Authors:  L B Jensen; F M Aarestrup
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Dan I Andersson
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Molecular typing of Campylobacter strains using the cmp gene encoding the major outer membrane protein.

Authors:  Shouxiong Huang; Taradon Luangtongkum; Teresa Y Morishita; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.171

5.  Molecular basis of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter: role of efflux pumps and target mutations.

Authors:  Laurent Mamelli; Valérie Prouzet-Mauléon; Jean-Marie Pagès; Francis Mégraud; Jean-Michel Bolla
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Enhanced in vivo fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in the absence of antibiotic selection pressure.

Authors:  Naidan Luo; Sonia Pereira; Orhan Sahin; Jun Lin; Shouxiong Huang; Linda Michel; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effect of macrolide usage on emergence of erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter isolates in chickens.

Authors:  Jun Lin; Meiguan Yan; Orhan Sahin; Sonia Pereira; Yun-Juan Chang; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: molecular mechanism and stability of the resistance phenotype.

Authors:  Amera Gibreel; Veronica N Kos; Monika Keelan; Cathy A Trieber; Simon Levesque; Sophie Michaud; Diane E Taylor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Campylobacter jejuni Infections: update on emerging issues and trends.

Authors:  B M Allos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03-28       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from cattle farms in Washington State.

Authors:  Wonki Bae; Katherine N Kaya; Dale D Hancock; Douglas R Call; Yong Ho Park; Thomas E Besser
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria: an update.

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Li; Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Ribosomal Mutations Conferring Macrolide Resistance in Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  Ghislaine Descours; Christophe Ginevra; Nathalie Jacotin; Françoise Forey; Joëlle Chastang; Elisabeth Kay; Jerome Etienne; Gérard Lina; Patricia Doublet; Sophie Jarraud
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Selection of Resistance to Clarithromycin in Mycobacterium abscessus Subspecies.

Authors:  Faiza Mougari; Feriel Bouziane; Flora Crockett; Rachid Nessar; Françoise Chau; Nicolas Veziris; Guillaume Sapriel; Laurent Raskine; Emmanuelle Cambau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Impaired fitness and transmission of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in its natural host.

Authors:  Taradon Luangtongkum; Zhangqi Shen; Virginia W Seng; Orhan Sahin; Byeonghwa Jeon; Peng Liu; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mutational and transcriptomic changes involved in the development of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Haihong Hao; Zonghui Yuan; Zhangqi Shen; Jing Han; Orhan Sahin; Peng Liu; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Ribosomal mutations as the main cause of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Mirva Lehtopolku; Pirkko Kotilainen; Marjo Haanperä-Heikkinen; Ulla-Maija Nakari; Marja-Liisa Hänninen; Pentti Huovinen; Anja Siitonen; Erkki Eerola; Jari Jalava; Antti J Hakanen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Emerging erm(B)-Mediated Macrolide Resistance Associated with Novel Multidrug Resistance Genomic Islands in Campylobacter.

Authors:  Dejun Liu; Weiwen Liu; Ziquan Lv; Junjie Xia; Xing Li; Yuxin Hao; Ying Zhou; Hong Yao; Zhihai Liu; Yang Wang; Jianzhong Shen; Yuebin Ke; Zhangqi Shen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Development and stability of bacteriocin resistance in Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  K V Hoang; N J Stern; J Lin
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Caught in the act: in vivo development of macrolide resistance to Campylobacter jejuni infection.

Authors:  J C Lindow; F Poly; D R Tribble; P Guerry; M P Carmolli; S Baqar; C K Porter; K K Pierce; M J Darsley; K S Sadigh; E A Dill; B D Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Development of a DNA microarray to detect antimicrobial resistance genes identified in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.

Authors:  Jonathan G Frye; Rebecca L Lindsey; Gaelle Rondeau; Steffen Porwollik; Fred Long; Michael McClelland; Charlene R Jackson; Mark D Englen; Richard J Meinersmann; Mark E Berrang; Johnnie A Davis; John B Barrett; Jennifer B Turpin; Sutawee N Thitaram; Paula J Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.