Literature DB >> 18778903

Identification of the risk factors for osteoporosis among postmenopausal women.

B Demir1, A Haberal, P Geyik, B Baskan, E Ozturkoglu, O Karacay, S Deveci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different durations of menopause at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and of different age at menopause intervals on the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis among untreated postmenopausal women. We also assessed related factors leading to low BMD.
METHODS: A total of 2769 postmenopausal women who had not taken any anti-osteoporosis treatment and/or hormone replacement therapy were divided into three groups according to duration of menopause at the time of BMD measurement. The women were also evaluated in four different age groups according to their age at menopause onset. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to determine related factors leading to low BMD. Investigated parameters include demographic characteristics, plasma glucose, lipids, and lipoproteins.
RESULTS: According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, among 2769 patients, 449 (16.2%) were identified as having osteoporosis, 1085 (39.2%) as having osteopenia, and 1235 (44.6%) as having normal BMD. Osteoporosis was determined in 10.6% and 16.2% of women with menopause duration of 0-3 years and 4-7 years, respectively, whereas this rate was 31.9% in women with menopause duration of over 7 years (p = 0.001). The percentages for osteopenia remained constant among the three different menopause durations (0-3 years: 37.2%, 4-7 years: 42.1%, and >7 years: 40.9%). Thirty percent of women with age at onset of <40 years were osteoporotic. However, the percentages of women with osteoporosis among the other age groups were similar (40-46 years: 18.3%, 47-52 years: 14.1%, and >52 years: 15.4%). The percentages for osteopenia remained relatively constant among the four age groups (36.7, 40, 39.1 and 39%). According to the multinomial logistic regression analysis, duration of menopause at the time of BMD test and parity were positively correlated with both osteoporosis and osteopenia, while glucose level was negatively correlated with both osteoporosis and osteopenia. Age at menopause was negatively correlated only for osteoporosis. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) level may be accepted as a clinically significant factor for osteopenia (OR: 1.01; CI(95%): 1.00-1.02). No differences were determined in the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with menopause duration of >7 years when evaluated according to the four menopause age groups as described before (p = 0.74). Contribution to the regression model was 0.8% by age at menopause, 5.6% by menopause duration at time of BMD measurement, 5.8% by both factors.
CONCLUSION: According to our results, osteoporosis is related more to the duration of menopause at the time of BMD measurement rather than the age at menopause among untreated postmenopausal women. High parity was determined as another risk factor for low BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18778903     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  The influence of parity on quantitative ultrasound evaluation of the calcaneus and hand phalanges in Polish postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Wojciech Pluskiewicz; Małgorzata Skwira-Kapała; Bogna Drozdzowska
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Association between prolonged breastfeeding and bone mineral density and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: KNHANES 2010-2011.

Authors:  I R Hwang; Y K Choi; W K Lee; J G Kim; I K Lee; S W Kim; K G Park
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Association between delivery at an advanced maternal age and osteoporosis in elderly Korean women.

Authors:  Eunju Ahn; Jungkwon Lee; Yong Soon Park; Hye-Mi Noh; Bo Ha Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Prevalence and risk factors associated with osteoporosis among residents aged above 20 years old in Chongqing, China.

Authors:  Xianxian Yang; Wenge Tang; Deqiang Mao; Qiang Shu; Hong Yin; Cheng Tang; Ming Zhang; Can Li; Xianbin Ding
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Evaluation of bone density measurement in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with hypertension and hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  Emel Kiyak Caglayan; Yaprak Engin-Ustun; Nagihan Sari; Seyhan Karacavus; Levent Seckin; Mustafa Kara
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2015-04-27

6.  A Study of Risk Factors and T- Score Variability in Romanian Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Rodica TöRöK-Oance
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Evaluation of the prevalence and correlated factors for decreased bone mass density among pre- and post-menopausal educated working women in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Samira M Mahboub; May N Al-Muammar; Azza A Elareefy
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Effects of multiparity and prolonged breast-feeding on maternal bone mineral density: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Janaka Lenora; Sarath Lekamwasam; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Prevalence of osteoporosis among the elderly population of Iran.

Authors:  Noushin Fahimfar; Sima Noorali; Shakiba Yousefi; Safoora Gharibzadeh; Gita Shafiee; Nekoo Panahi; Mahnaz Sanjari; Ramin Heshmat; Farshad Sharifi; Neda Mehrdad; Alireza Raeisi; Iraj Nabipour; Bagher Larijani; Afshin Ostovar
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  CD133: enhancement of bone healing by local transplantation of peripheral blood cells in a biologically delayed rat osteotomy model.

Authors:  Bernd Preininger; Georg Duda; Hinnerk Gerigk; Jonas Bruckner; Agnes Ellinghaus; F Andrea Sass; Carsten Perka; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek; Anke Dienelt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.