Literature DB >> 18778716

An agent-based model to investigate the roles of attractive and repellent pheromones in ant decision making during foraging.

Elva J H Robinson1, Francis L W Ratnieks, M Holcombe.   

Abstract

Pharaoh's ants organise their foraging system using three types of trail pheromone. All previous foraging models based on specific ant foraging systems have assumed that only a single attractive pheromone is used. Here we present an agent-based model based on trail choice at a trail bifurcation within the foraging trail network of a Pharaoh's ant colony which includes both attractive (positive) and repellent (negative) trail pheromones. Experiments have previously shown that Pharaoh's ants use both types of pheromone. We investigate how the repellent pheromone affects trail choice and foraging success in our simulated foraging system. We find that both the repellent and attractive pheromones have a role in trail choice, and that the repellent pheromone prevents random fluctuations which could otherwise lead to a positive feedback loop causing the colony to concentrate its foraging on the unrewarding trail. An emergent feature of the model is a high level of variability in the level of repellent pheromone on the unrewarding branch. This is caused by the repellent pheromone exerting negative feedback on its own deposition. We also investigate the dynamic situation where the location of the food is changed after foraging trails are established. We find that the repellent pheromone has a key role in enabling the colony to refocus the foraging effort to the new location. Our results show that having a repellent pheromone is adaptive, as it increases the robustness and flexibility of the colony's overall foraging response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18778716     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  Negative feedback from maternal signals reduces false alarms by collectively signalling offspring.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hamel; Reginald B Cocroft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Modeling the Adaptive Role of Negative Signaling in Honey Bee Intraspecific Competition.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson; James C Nieh
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 1.309

3.  Composite collective decision-making.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Benjamin Czaczkes; Carolin Iglhaut; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Negative feedback may suppress variation to improve collective foraging performance.

Authors:  Andreagiovanni Reina; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  The organization of societal conflicts by pavement ants Tetramorium caespitum: an agent-based model of amine-mediated decision making.

Authors:  Kevin M Hoover; Andrew N Bubak; Isaac J Law; Jazmine D W Yaeger; Kenneth J Renner; John G Swallow; Michael J Greene
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  A distributed algorithm to maintain and repair the trail networks of arboreal ants.

Authors:  Arjun Chandrasekhar; Deborah M Gordon; Saket Navlakha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Negative feedback enables fast and flexible collective decision-making in ants.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Roger Schürch; Tomer J Czaczkes; Keeley Taylor; Thomas Durance; Sam M Jones; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ants can learn to forage on one-way trails.

Authors:  Pedro Leite Ribeiro; André Frazão Helene; Gilberto Xavier; Carlos Navas; Fernando Leite Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Bayesian superorganism: externalized memories facilitate distributed sampling.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Nigel R Franks; Roland J Baddeley
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.118

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.