OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behaviour of donor myoblasts at the vesico-ureteric junction (VUJ) and to evaluate their potential as an autologous bulking agent, as myoblast transplantation has been shown to regenerate damaged or degenerated tissue, and it was postulated that they could be used to treat vesico-ureteric reflux. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Muscle biopsies were obtained from the lower limb muscles of 10 pigs. The quality of the cells was evaluated by electrophysiological and immunohistochemical tests. The cell membranes of myoblasts were labelled with PKH26, a fluorescent dye. Six weeks after taking of the muscle biopsies all pigs underwent cell transplantation; 30 x 10(6) cells suspended in transplantation medium (in 1-mL syringes) were injected at the VUJ, into the proximal urethra and the rhabdosphincter. At the VUJ volumes of 1 mL were injected, whereas in the urethra and rhabdosphincter small cell depots (0.1 mL) were injected. All the pigs were killed 8 weeks later, and the myoblasts and newly formed myofibres were identified using fluorescence microscopy, with a histological evaluation and investigation of potential local inflammatory reaction. RESULTS: Two to three intact layers of autologous myoblasts were found in the outer aspects of the large cell depots in the VUJ. Immunohistochemistry further showed that the myoblasts were only viable at these outermost borders of the large bulking areas, whereas necrosis with red fluorescent cell detritus was visible in the remaining central aspects of the large bulk of cells. By contrast, cells survived and formed myotubes in the wall of the proximal urethra and the rhabdosphincter where the small cell depots had been injected. CONCLUSIONS: In small depots, transplanted autologous myoblasts can survive and differentiate into myofibres, while in a large bulk of cells the vast majority of cells become necrotic. The present results show that myoblasts cannot be used for augmentation of large volumes of tissue or as a bulking agent.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behaviour of donor myoblasts at the vesico-ureteric junction (VUJ) and to evaluate their potential as an autologous bulking agent, as myoblast transplantation has been shown to regenerate damaged or degenerated tissue, and it was postulated that they could be used to treat vesico-ureteric reflux. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Muscle biopsies were obtained from the lower limb muscles of 10 pigs. The quality of the cells was evaluated by electrophysiological and immunohistochemical tests. The cell membranes of myoblasts were labelled with PKH26, a fluorescent dye. Six weeks after taking of the muscle biopsies all pigs underwent cell transplantation; 30 x 10(6) cells suspended in transplantation medium (in 1-mL syringes) were injected at the VUJ, into the proximal urethra and the rhabdosphincter. At the VUJ volumes of 1 mL were injected, whereas in the urethra and rhabdosphincter small cell depots (0.1 mL) were injected. All the pigs were killed 8 weeks later, and the myoblasts and newly formed myofibres were identified using fluorescence microscopy, with a histological evaluation and investigation of potential local inflammatory reaction. RESULTS: Two to three intact layers of autologous myoblasts were found in the outer aspects of the large cell depots in the VUJ. Immunohistochemistry further showed that the myoblasts were only viable at these outermost borders of the large bulking areas, whereas necrosis with red fluorescent cell detritus was visible in the remaining central aspects of the large bulk of cells. By contrast, cells survived and formed myotubes in the wall of the proximal urethra and the rhabdosphincter where the small cell depots had been injected. CONCLUSIONS: In small depots, transplanted autologous myoblasts can survive and differentiate into myofibres, while in a large bulk of cells the vast majority of cells become necrotic. The present results show that myoblasts cannot be used for augmentation of large volumes of tissue or as a bulking agent.