Giuseppe Benagiano1, Carlo Bastianelli, Manuela Farris. 1. University 'la Sapienza', Postgraduate School of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Policlinico Umberto I degrees , Viale Regina Margherita 245, 00161 Roma, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Synthetic compounds can bind to progesterone receptors and these progesterone receptor ligands exhibit a spectrum of activities ranging from pure antagonism to a mixture of agonism and antagonism. These substances have been classified as antiprogestins or as selective progesterone receptor modulators. OBJECTIVE: There are several hundred selective progesterone receptor modulators available, although only a dozen or so have been evaluated to any significant extent. The best-known selective progesterone receptor modulators are mifepristone (RU 486), asoprisnil (J 867), onapristone (ZK 98299), ulipristal (CDB 2914), Proellex() (CDB 4124), ORG 33628 and ORG 31710. METHODS: A careful evaluation of existing major review papers and of recently published articles was carried out for the indications under review, focusing not only on mifepristone, but also on those other selective progesterone receptor modulators for which data are available. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: Outside pregnancy, selective progesterone receptor modulators are used or have been tested clinically for a number of indications in reproductive medicine: as oral contraceptives, alone or in combination with a progestin, to improve cycle control in users of progestin-only contraceptives, as emergency contraceptives, for the medical treatment of uterine fibroids, in cases of endometriosis and premenstrual syndrome and to improve ovarian stimulation prior to in vitro fertilisation. In the authors' opinion, as of today, few applications outside pregnancy seem worthy of large-scale use: emergency contraception and long-term medical management of uterine fibroids and possibly of endometriosis.
BACKGROUND: Synthetic compounds can bind to progesterone receptors and these progesterone receptor ligands exhibit a spectrum of activities ranging from pure antagonism to a mixture of agonism and antagonism. These substances have been classified as antiprogestins or as selective progesterone receptor modulators. OBJECTIVE: There are several hundred selective progesterone receptor modulators available, although only a dozen or so have been evaluated to any significant extent. The best-known selective progesterone receptor modulators are mifepristone (RU 486), asoprisnil (J 867), onapristone (ZK 98299), ulipristal (CDB 2914), Proellex() (CDB 4124), ORG 33628 and ORG 31710. METHODS: A careful evaluation of existing major review papers and of recently published articles was carried out for the indications under review, focusing not only on mifepristone, but also on those other selective progesterone receptor modulators for which data are available. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: Outside pregnancy, selective progesterone receptor modulators are used or have been tested clinically for a number of indications in reproductive medicine: as oral contraceptives, alone or in combination with a progestin, to improve cycle control in users of progestin-only contraceptives, as emergency contraceptives, for the medical treatment of uterine fibroids, in cases of endometriosis and premenstrual syndrome and to improve ovarian stimulation prior to in vitro fertilisation. In the authors' opinion, as of today, few applications outside pregnancy seem worthy of large-scale use: emergency contraception and long-term medical management of uterine fibroids and possibly of endometriosis.
Authors: Scott J Lusher; Hans C A Raaijmakers; Diep Vu-Pham; Bert Kazemier; Rolien Bosch; Ross McGuire; Rita Azevedo; Hans Hamersma; Koen Dechering; Arthur Oubrie; Marcel van Duin; Jacob de Vlieg Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Scott J Lusher; Hans C A Raaijmakers; Diep Vu-Pham; Koen Dechering; Tsang Wai Lam; Angus R Brown; Niall M Hamilton; Olaf Nimz; Rolien Bosch; Ross McGuire; Arthur Oubrie; Jacob de Vlieg Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Timothy I Richardson; Christian A Clarke; Kuo-Long Yu; Ying K Yee; Thomas J Bleisch; Jose E Lopez; Scott A Jones; Norman E Hughes; Brian S Muehl; Charles W Lugar; Terry L Moore; Pamela K Shetler; Richard W Zink; John J Osborne; Chahrzad Montrose-Rafizadeh; Nita Patel; Andrew G Geiser; Rachelle J Sells Galvin; Jeffrey A Dodge Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Chelsea R Tieszen; Alicia A Goyeneche; BreeAnn N Brandhagen; Casey T Ortbahn; Carlos M Telleria Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Hareesh B Nair; Bindu Santhamma; Kalarickal V Dileep; Peter Binkley; Kirk Acosta; Kam Y J Zhang; Robert Schenken; Klaus Nickisch Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.379