| Literature DB >> 18778150 |
Abstract
The currently available meta-analytic methods for correlations have restrictive assumptions. The fixed-effects methods assume equal population correlations and exhibit poor performance under correlation heterogeneity. The random-effects methods do not assume correlation homogeneity but are based on an equally unrealistic assumption that the selected studies are a random sample from a well-defined superpopulation of study populations. The random-effects methods can accommodate correlation heterogeneity, but these methods do not perform properly in typical applications where the studies are nonrandomly selected. A new fixed-effects meta-analytic confidence interval for bivariate correlations is proposed that is easy to compute and performs well under correlation heterogeneity and nonrandomly selected studies. Copyright (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18778150 DOI: 10.1037/a0012868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Methods ISSN: 1082-989X