Literature DB >> 18777551

Noninvasive estimation of hepatic steatosis using plain CT vs. chemical-shift MR imaging: significance for living donors.

Kengo Yoshimitsu1, Yousuke Kuroda, Makoto Nakamuta, Akinobu Taketomi, Hiroyuki Irie, Tsuyoshi Tajima, Masakazu Hirakawa, Kousei Ishigami, Yasuhiro Ushijima, Tomomi Yamada, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare plain computed tomography (CT) and chemical-shift MR imaging (CSI) for establishing a noninvasive method to estimate the degree of steatosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 58 patients who had histological proof of liver tissue and underwent CT and/or CSI within two weeks, were studied. They consisted of 38 living donor candidates and 20 liver surgery patients without hepatitis or cirrhosis. The CT index (CTI) and MR index (MRI) were defined and correlated to histological grades of steatosis. Correlation was also performed exclusively for mild steatosis (grades 0-2).
RESULTS: Both plain CT (rho=0.74, P<0.0001) and CSI (rho=0.83, P<0.0001) had good correlation with histological grades of steatosis, showing no significant difference between them. For mild steatosis, CSI (rho=0.77, P<0.0001) had better correlation than CT (rho=0.49, P=0.001) (P=0.049). Accuracy in differentiation between grade 0-1 vs. grade 2-4 steatosis was 85% using a CTI>6, and 91% using an MRI<0.03 as criteria. That between grade 0-2 and grade 3-4 was 91% using a CTI>-8 and 88% using an MRI<0.25 as criteria.
CONCLUSION: Both plain CT and CSI were useful in estimating the degree of steatosis but CSI was superior to CT in differentiating mild steatosis. These indices may at least partially replace percutaneous biopsy in evaluating grades of steatosis for living donors. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777551     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Houchun H Hu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Specificity of unenhanced CT for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: implications for the investigation of the natural history of incidental steatosis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Seong Ho Park; Luke Hahn; Sung-Gyu Lee; Kyongtae T Bae; Eun Sil Yu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Sex and race differences in the prevalence of fatty liver disease as measured by computed tomography liver attenuation in European American and African American participants of the NHLBI family heart study.

Authors:  Kari E North; Mariaelisa Graff; Nora Franceschini; Alexander P Reiner; Mary F Feitosa; John Jeffrey Carr; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Mary K Wojczynski; Ingrid B Borecki
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anneloes E Bohte; Jochem R van Werven; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Quantification of hepatic steatosis with dual-energy computed tomography: comparison with tissue reference standards and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the ob/ob mouse.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; Catherine D G Hines; Stephen T Brunner; Rashmi M Agni; Jens-Peter Kühn; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Guang-Hong Chen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for monitoring future liver remnant function after portal vein embolization and extended hemihepatectomy: A prospective trial.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Philip Raabe; Lutz Lüdemann; Maciej Malinowski; Martin Stockmann; Daniel Seehofer; Johann Pratschke; Bernd Hamm; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Elevated prevalence of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis in World Trade Center General Responder Cohort in a program of CT lung screening.

Authors:  Xiangmeng Chen; Teng Ma; Rowena Yip; Ponni V Perumalswami; Andrea D Branch; Sara Lewis; Michael Crane; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Comparative accuracy of CT, dual-echo MRI and MR spectroscopy for preoperative liver fat quantification in living related liver donors.

Authors:  Ruchi Rastogi; Subhash Gupta; Bhavya Garg; Sandeep Vohra; Manav Wadhawan; Harsh Rastogi
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.