Literature DB >> 18777178

Transformation of different barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars by Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection of in vitro cultured ovules.

Inger Baeksted Holme1, Henrik Brinch-Pedersen, Mette Lange, Preben Bach Holm.   

Abstract

Most cultivars of higher plants display poor regeneration capacity of explants due to yet unknown genotypic determined mechanisms. This implies that technologies such as transformation often are restricted to model cultivars with good tissue characteristics. In the present paper, we add further evidence to our previous hypothesis that regeneration from young barley embryos derived from in vitro-cultured ovules is genotype independent. We investigated the ovule culture ability of four cultivars Femina, Salome, Corniche and Alexis, known to have poor response in other types of tissue culture, and compared that to the data for the model cultivar, Golden Promise. Subsequently, we analyzed the transformation efficiencies of the four cultivars using the protocol for Agrobacterium infection of ovules, previously developed for Golden Promise. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL0, carrying the binary vector pVec8-GFP harboring a hygromycin resistance gene and the green fluorescence protein (GFP) gene, was used for transformation. The results strongly indicate that the tissue culture response level in ovule culture is genotype independent. However, we did observe differences between cultivars with respect to frequencies of GFP-expressing embryos and frequencies of regeneration from the GFP-expressing embryos under hygromycin selection. The final frequencies of transformed plants per ovule were lower for the four cultivars than that for Golden Promise but the differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that ovule culture transformation can be used successfully to transform cultivars other than Golden Promise. Similar to that observed for Golden Promise, the ovule culture technique allows for the rapid and direct generation of high quality transgenic plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777178     DOI: 10.1007/s00299-008-0605-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


  21 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants.

Authors:  S M Kaeppler; H F Kaeppler; Y Rhee
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Efficient generation of transgenic barley: the way forward to modulate plant-microbe interactions.

Authors:  Goetz Hensel; Vladimir Valkov; Jill Middlefell-Williams; Jochen Kumlehn
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.549

3.  Genetic transformation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) via infection of androgenetic pollen cultures with Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  Jochen Kumlehn; Liliya Serazetdinova; Goetz Hensel; Dirk Becker; Horst Loerz
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.803

4.  Differences in susceptibility of Arabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration.

Authors:  J Nam; A G Matthysse; S B Gelvin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Transformation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection of in vitro cultured ovules.

Authors:  Inger Baeksted Holme; Henrik Brinch-Pedersen; Mette Lange; Preben Bach Holm
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Somaclonal variation in the progeny of transgenic barley.

Authors:  P Bregitzer; S E Halbert; P G Lemaux
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genotypic variability of soybean response to agrobacterium strains harboring the ti or ri plasmids.

Authors:  L D Owens; D E Cress
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Inheritance of Resistance to Crown Gall in Pisum sativum.

Authors:  S L Robbs; M C Hawes; H J Lin; S G Pueppke; L Y Smith
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Comparison of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of four barley cultivars using the GFP and GUS reporter genes.

Authors:  F Murray; R Brettell; P Matthews; D Bishop; J Jacobsen
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  A DNA transformation-competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium.

Authors:  G R Lazo; P A Stein; R A Ludwig
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1991-10
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Julia Jansing; Andreas Schiermeyer; Stefan Schillberg; Rainer Fischer; Luisa Bortesi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Identification of regulatory factors promoting embryogenic callus formation in barley through transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Jingqi Suo; Chenlu Zhou; Zhanghui Zeng; Xipu Li; Hongwu Bian; Junhui Wang; Muyuan Zhu; Ning Han
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.215

3.  TRA1: A Locus Responsible for Controlling Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformability in Barley.

Authors:  Beata Orman-Ligeza; Wendy Harwood; Pete E Hedley; Alison Hinchcliffe; Malcolm Macaulay; Cristobal Uauy; Kay Trafford
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Horizontal Stacking of PAPhy_a Cisgenes in Barley Is a Potent Strategy for Increasing Mature Grain Phytase Activity.

Authors:  Inger Baeksted Holme; Claus Krogh Madsen; Toni Wendt; Henrik Brinch-Pedersen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.