Literature DB >> 18776789

Ultrasound imaging of carotid artery stenosis: application of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria to a Single Institution Clinical Practice.

Ryan M Braun1, Raymond E Bertino, Joseph Milbrandt, Macey Bray.   

Abstract

Carotid duplex Doppler ultrasound (CDDU) is increasingly used for the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. In CDDU, velocity measurements are used to estimate the degree of ICA stenosis. Traditionally, radiologists have relied on institutional experience and published research when interpreting CDDU. In 2003, a consensus committee of experts convened as the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Committee and proposed standard criteria for grading ICA stenosis including the use of peak systolic velocity (PSV) of greater than 230 cm/s for assigning ICA stenosis of greater than 70%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria in classifying carotid stenoses. This study shows the following: (1) that the criterion of PSV of greater than 230 cm/s for angiographic stenosis of greater than 70% performs as predicted by the consensus committee, with sensitivity of 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.99) and specificity of 84.4% (95% CI, 0.80-0.88); (2) using Pearson correlations, there is no statistical difference found between the correlation of PSV with angiography (0.825 [95% CI, 0.792-0.853]), end diastolic velocity with angiography (0.762 [95% CI, 0.718-0.799]), and the ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) systolic ratio with angiography (0.766 [95% CI, 0.723-0.802]). The correlation of the ICA/CCA diastolic ratio with angiography (0.643 [95% CI, 0.584-0.696]) is less predictive at a 95% confidence interval than the other 3 velocity-based variables, and (3) when the 4 velocity-based variables are taken in pairs (eg, PSV and end diastolic velocity), there is no pair that shows statistically significant improvement in performance. Peak systolic velocity in combination with other variables does show a slight trend toward superior performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18776789     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31818625b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  7 in total

1.  A novel method to quantify carotid artery stenosis by Doppler ultrasound: Using the continuity principle.

Authors:  Christopher B Wong; Joseph C Wong
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2010

2.  The clinical implications of adopting new criteria for the grading of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Nicole Curtis; Martin Necas; Matthew Versteeg
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-02-14

Review 3.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  Prevalence and Risk Factors Analysis of Carotid Stenosis Among Ischaemic Heart Diseases Patient in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Redoy Ranjan; Dipannita Adhikary; Debasish Das; Asit Baran Adhikary
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Carotid Artery Stenosis Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Marcelo P da Rosa; Ricardo Schwendler; Rodrigo Lopes; Vera L Portal
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2013-09-06

6.  Prevalence of carotid artery stenosis in ischaemic heart disease patients in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Dipannita Adhikary; Redoy Ranjan; Sabita Mandal; Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader; Dipak Kumar Mitra; Asit Baran Adhikary
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-02-15

Review 7.  Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis?

Authors:  Victor J Del Brutto; Heather L Gornik; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.