Literature DB >> 18776096

Comparison of five culture methods for Salmonella isolation from swine fecal samples of known infection status.

Brenda C Love1, Marcos H Rostagno.   

Abstract

The current study was conducted to evaluate 5 bacteriologic culture methods (methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) for recovery of Salmonella enterica from swine feces, both for sensitivity of detection (ability to recover Salmonella from a positive sample) and for specificity (not to inadvertently identify an organism as a Salmonella species in a negative sample). Fifty-six negative samples and 46 positive samples were processed using each of the 5 methods, which differed primarily in the combinations of enrichment media used. All negative samples were negative for Salmonella when cultured by all 5 methods (100% specificity). Two of the methods (methods 1 and 4) resulted in the recovery of significantly less (P < 0.05) Salmonella when compared with the remaining 3 methods (methods 2, 3, and 5). No one method was successful in recovering Salmonella from all positive samples, although recovery with method 2 was statistically similar to the total number of positive samples analyzed (42 vs. 46 Salmonella-positive samples, P > 0.05). This study shows that culture methods differ significantly in their performance regarding the isolation of Salmonella from swine fecal samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18776096     DOI: 10.1177/104063870802000514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  7 in total

1.  Emergence of Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- as the primary serovar identified from swine clinical samples and development of a multiplex real-time PCR for improved Salmonella serovar-level identification.

Authors:  Samantha A Naberhaus; Adam C Krull; Laura K Bradner; Karen M Harmon; Paulo Arruda; Bailey L Arruda; Orhan Sahin; Eric R Burrough; Kent J Schwartz; Amanda J Kreuder
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Prevalence, enumeration, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of salmonella enterica isolates from carcasses at two large United States pork processing plants.

Authors:  John W Schmidt; Dayna M Brichta-Harhay; Norasak Kalchayanand; Joseph M Bosilevac; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Transmission dynamics of a multidrug-resistant Salmonella typhimurium outbreak in a dairy farm.

Authors:  Cristina Lanzas; Lorin D Warnick; Karen L James; Emily M Wright; Martin Wiedmann; Yrjo T Gröhn
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.171

4.  Colistin resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica strains isolated from swine in Brazil.

Authors:  Adriano Savoia Morales; Juliana Fragoso de Araújo; Vasco Túlio de Moura Gomes; Adrienny Trindade Reis Costa; Dália dos Prazeres Rodrigues; Thais Sebastiana Porfida Ferreira; Pedro Henrique Nogueira de Lima Filsner; Maria Roberta Felizardo; Andrea Micke Moreno
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-08-22

5.  Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs.

Authors:  A F A Pires; J A Funk; C A Bolin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Molecular diagnostics of Salmonella and Campylobacter in human/animal fecal samples remain feasible after long-term sample storage without specific requirements.

Authors:  C B Harder; S Persson; J Christensen; A Ljubic; E M Nielsen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  AIMS Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-14

7.  Comparison of two culture techniques used to detect environmental contamination with Salmonella enterica in a large-animal hospital.

Authors:  Catriona H Lyle; Cornelius H Annandale; Johan Gouws; Paul S Morley
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 1.474

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.