Literature DB >> 18776067

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement measure.

Yu-Wei Hsieh1, Chun-Hou Wang, Ching-Fan Sheu, I-Ping Hsueh, Ching-Lin Hsieh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure is unknown, which limits the application and interpretation of change scores.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the MCID of the 3 subscales (ie, lower extremity, upper extremity, and mobility subscales) of the STREAM using the method of patients' global ratings of change.
METHODS: Eighty-one stroke patients participated in this study. The patients' global ratings of change were used to rate their changes of limb movements and basic mobility skills on the 15-point Likert scale. The mean change scores on the 3 subscales of STREAM of the MCID group (ie, scored on +2 to +3 or -2 to -3) served as the estimates of the MCID.
RESULTS: There were 42, 38, and 43 patients in the MCID group, and the estimates of the MCID were 2.2, 1.9, and 4.8 points for the upper-extremity subscale, lower-extremity subscale, and mobility subscale, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that if the mean change scores on the 3 subscales of the STREAM within a stroke group have reached 2.2, 1.9, and 4.8 points, the change scores on the 3 subscales of the STREAM can be perceived by patients as clinically important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18776067     DOI: 10.1177/1545968308316385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  3 in total

Review 1.  Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Assessing the stroke-specific quality of life for outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation: minimal detectable change and clinically important difference.

Authors:  Keh-chung Lin; Tiffany Fu; Ching-yi Wu; Ching-ju Hsieh
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Eclectic/mixed model method for upper extremity functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: A pilot study.

Authors:  K Vijaya Kumar; Abraham M Joshua; Rakshith Kedambadi; P Prasanna Mithra
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.