Literature DB >> 18775835

Physician-assisted suicide: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians.

Anna Lindblad1, Rurik Löfmark, Niels Lynöe.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the attitudes of Swedish physicians towards physician-assisted suicide.
DESIGN: A postal questionnaire on the respondent's opinion of physician-assisted suicide was sent to a randomly selected sample of physicians in Sweden. The respondents were given the opportunity of furnishing arguments of their own and of prioritizing arguments. They were also asked about possible influence on their own and patients' trust in the healthcare system if physician-assisted suicide was to be legally accepted. PARTICIPANTS: 1,200 physicians from six specialties, approximately 200 individuals each in: general practice, geriatrics, internal medicine, oncology, psychiatry and surgery.
SETTING: The study was commissioned by the Swedish Medical Society and its logo was printed on questionnaires and envelopes.
RESULTS: The total response rate was 74%, ranging between 63%-80% among the specialties. On average 34% were pro physician-assisted suicide, 39% against it and 25% were doubtful; 2% per cent did not respond to the question at all. Psychiatrists were significantly more accepting than oncologists, who were the most restrictive specialty. Older physicians (>50 years) provided a significantly more accepting attitude than younger ones (<or=51 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the World Medical Association condemns physician-assisted suicide as unethical, the present survey indicates that there is no clear majority for or against physician-assisted suicide among Swedish physicians, and that significantly more elderly physicians have an accepting attitude towards physician-assisted suicide. There is a need for further research explaining the differences between the age groups as well as the variation between specialities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18775835     DOI: 10.1177/1403494808090163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Antonino Naro; Rosaria De Luca; Margherita Russo; Lory Caccamo; Alfredo Manuli; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  How to reveal disguised paternalism.

Authors:  Niels Lynöe; Niklas Juth; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-08-12

3.  To treat or not to treat a newborn child with severe brain damage? A cross-sectional study of physicians' and the general population's perceptions of intentions.

Authors:  Anders Rydvall; Niklas Juth; Mikael Sandlund; Magnus Domellöf; Niels Lynøe
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-02

4.  "Right to recommend, wrong to require"- an empirical and philosophical study of the views among physicians and the general public on smoking cessation as a condition for surgery.

Authors:  Joar Björk; Niklas Juth; Niels Lynøe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  How to reveal disguised paternalism: version 2.0.

Authors:  Niels Lynøe; Ingemar Engström; Niklas Juth
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Is healthcare providers' value-neutrality depending on how controversial a medical intervention is? Analysis of 10 more or less controversial interventions.

Authors:  Niels Lynöe; Joar Björk; Niklas Juth
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2017-04-19

7.  Trends in Swedish physicians' attitudes towards physician-assisted suicide: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Niels Lynøe; Anna Lindblad; Ingemar Engström; Mikael Sandlund; Niklas Juth
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  H M M T B Herath; K W S M Wijayawardhana; U I Wickramarachchi; Chaturaka Rodrigo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.