INTRODUCTION: The spontaneous presence of a coved-type ECG is considered as an important risk factor in Brugada syndrome. However, diagnosis making and risk stratification may be hampered by the dynamic nature of the ECG abnormalities. The objective of this study was to determine the variability and predictive value of the electrocardiogram in Brugada patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed consecutive 12-lead ECGs from 89 ICD patients (44 +/- 14 years, 69 males) with Brugada syndrome. A total of 1,161 ECGs were included for analysis (13 +/- 8 ECGs/patient). Twenty-four percent of the ECGs/patient were coved-type I, 25% saddleback-type II or III, and 51% normal. Fifty-seven patients had a diagnostic coved-type ECG spontaneously (group A), 32 patients only after drug challenge (group B). In group A, 38% of the ECGs/patient were diagnostic, 25% saddleback-type, and 37% normal. Fifty-five group A patients (96%) had transient normalization and/or conversion to saddleback-type ECGs. During a mean follow-up of 48 +/- 35 months, 16 patients (18%) experienced appropriate shocks. All patients with appropriate shocks had spontaneous diagnostic ECGs. They tended to have more coved-type ECGs (36 vs 22%, respectively, P = 0.05) than patients without appropriate shocks. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of serial ECG recordings in an ICD patient population shows that the Brugada-ECG pattern is highly variable over time. In patients with spontaneous coved-type ECG, only every third ECG is diagnostic and every third ECG normal. Patients with spontaneous coved-type ST-segment elevation have a high incidence of appropriate shocks. Spontaneous saddleback-type electrocardiograms are not helpful for risk stratification.
INTRODUCTION: The spontaneous presence of a coved-type ECG is considered as an important risk factor in Brugada syndrome. However, diagnosis making and risk stratification may be hampered by the dynamic nature of the ECG abnormalities. The objective of this study was to determine the variability and predictive value of the electrocardiogram in Brugada patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed consecutive 12-lead ECGs from 89 ICDpatients (44 +/- 14 years, 69 males) with Brugada syndrome. A total of 1,161 ECGs were included for analysis (13 +/- 8 ECGs/patient). Twenty-four percent of the ECGs/patient were coved-type I, 25% saddleback-type II or III, and 51% normal. Fifty-seven patients had a diagnostic coved-type ECG spontaneously (group A), 32 patients only after drug challenge (group B). In group A, 38% of the ECGs/patient were diagnostic, 25% saddleback-type, and 37% normal. Fifty-five group A patients (96%) had transient normalization and/or conversion to saddleback-type ECGs. During a mean follow-up of 48 +/- 35 months, 16 patients (18%) experienced appropriate shocks. All patients with appropriate shocks had spontaneous diagnostic ECGs. They tended to have more coved-type ECGs (36 vs 22%, respectively, P = 0.05) than patients without appropriate shocks. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of serial ECG recordings in an ICDpatient population shows that the Brugada-ECG pattern is highly variable over time. In patients with spontaneous coved-type ECG, only every third ECG is diagnostic and every third ECG normal. Patients with spontaneous coved-type ST-segment elevation have a high incidence of appropriate shocks. Spontaneous saddleback-type electrocardiograms are not helpful for risk stratification.
Authors: Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde Journal: Europace Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Paula G Macedo; Josep Brugada; Pavel Leinveber; Begoña Benito; Irma Molina; Fatima Sert-Kuniyoshi; Taro Adachi; Jan Bukartyk; Christelle van der Walt; Tomas Konecny; Shantal Maharaj; Tomas Kara; Josep Montserrat; Virend Somers Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jonathan M Daw; C Anwar A Chahal; Jeffrey S Arkles; David J Callans; Sanjay Dixit; Andrew E Epstein; David S Frankel; Fermin C Garcia; Matthew C Hyman; Ramanan Kumareswaran; David Lin; Saman Nazarian; Michael P Riley; Pasquale Santangeli; Robert D Schaller; Gregory E Supple; Cory Tschabrunn; Francis E Marchlinski; Rajat Deo Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2022-02-08
Authors: Arnon Adler; Guy Topaz; Karin Heller; David Zeltser; Tami Ohayon; Uri Rozovski; Amir Halkin; Raphael Rosso; Shay Ben-Shachar; Charles Antzelevitch; Sami Viskin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Fatima Jaffer; Andreja Avbersek; Rosaria Vavassori; Carmen Fons; Jaume Campistol; Michela Stagnaro; Elisa De Grandis; Edvige Veneselli; Hendrik Rosewich; Melania Gianotta; Claudio Zucca; Francesca Ragona; Tiziana Granata; Nardo Nardocci; Mohamed Mikati; Ashley R Helseth; Cyrus Boelman; Berge A Minassian; Sophia Johns; Sarah I Garry; Ingrid E Scheffer; Isabelle Gourfinkel-An; Ines Carrilho; Sarah E Aylett; Matthew Parton; Michael G Hanna; Henry Houlden; Brian Neville; Manju A Kurian; Jan Novy; Josemir W Sander; Pier D Lambiase; Elijah R Behr; Tsveta Schyns; Alexis Arzimanoglou; J Helen Cross; Juan P Kaski; Sanjay M Sisodiya Journal: Brain Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 13.501