Literature DB >> 18773729

Effects of inversion and negation on social inferences from faces.

Isabel M Santos1, Andrew W Young.   

Abstract

Judgments about personality and other social characteristics based on facial appearance are remarkably consistent across individuals. However, whereas the facial cues that underpin age and sex judgments are already well understood, the physical bases for judgments of characteristics such as intelligence or trustworthiness are still unknown. Inversion and photographic negation are used here to investigate the visual processes underlying social inferences from the face and to explore whether various judgments might rely on different perceptual representations. In experiment 1, the perceptions of age, sex, attractiveness, approachability, intelligence, and trustworthiness, but not distinctiveness, were affected by inversion, and all these characteristics were affected by negation. The effects of inversion and negation were independent, suggesting that they impaired the encoding of different types of information. Moreover, an independent manipulation of hue and luminance in experiment 2 showed that the effects of negation were mainly due to the reversal of luminance values. These results are consistent with the view that information about the configuration of features (the processing of which is impaired by inversion) and information about surface properties (the processing of which is impaired by brightness negation) are both used in the perception of social characteristics from faces. In addition, the fact that there was a similar pattern of impairment across most judgments suggests that there is an initial common perceptual representation of the face, from which most characteristics are inferred.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18773729     DOI: 10.1068/p5278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  12 in total

1.  Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images.

Authors:  Richard J W Vernon; Clare A M Sutherland; Andrew W Young; Tom Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Altered amygdala connectivity within the social brain in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Prerona Mukherjee; Heather C Whalley; James W McKirdy; Reiner Sprengelmeyer; Andrew W Young; Andrew M McIntosh; Stephen M Lawrie; Jeremy Hall
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Allocentric kin recognition is not affected by facial inversion.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Lisa M DeBruine; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  On the perception of religious group membership from faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; James V Garrett; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Individual differences in anxiety predict neural measures of visual working memory for untrustworthy faces.

Authors:  Federica Meconi; Roy Luria; Paola Sessa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  A Review and Clarification of the Terms "holistic," "configural," and "relational" in the Face Perception Literature.

Authors:  Daniel W Piepers; Rachel A Robbins
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17

7.  Skin and bones: the contribution of skin tone and facial structure to racial prototypicality ratings.

Authors:  Michael A Strom; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Shunan Zhang; P Matthew Bronstad; Hoon Koo Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Social cognition, the male brain and the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Jeremy Hall; Ruth C M Philip; Katie Marwick; Heather C Whalley; Liana Romaniuk; Andrew M McIntosh; Isabel Santos; Reiner Sprengelmeyer; Eve C Johnstone; Andrew C Stanfield; Andy W Young; Stephen M Lawrie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using effort to measure reward value of faces in children with autism.

Authors:  Louise Ewing; Elizabeth Pellicano; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Social judgement in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Katie Nicol; Merrick Pope; Reiner Sprengelmeyer; Andrew W Young; Jeremy Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.