Literature DB >> 18772946

Do phosphorus requirements for RNA limit genome size in crustacean zooplankton?

Dag O Hessen1, Marc Ventura, James J Elser.   

Abstract

As for most other organisms, genome size in zooplankton differs widely. This may have a range of consequences for growth rate, development, and life history strategies, yet the causes of this pronounced variability are not settled. Here we propose that small genome size may be an evolutionary consequence of phosphorus (P) allocation from DNA to RNA under P deficiency. To test this hypothesis we have compared the two major groups of zooplankton, copepods and cladocerans, that have overlapping niches and body size. Relative to the cladocerans, copepods have a more complex life history and a lower mass-specific P content, while cladocerans tend to have higher P and RNA contents and higher specific growth rates and frequently experience P-limited growth, likely due to a shortage of P for ribosome synthesis. Cladocerans also generally have smaller genomes than copepods (1C = 0.17-0.63 pg DNA.cell(-1) vs. 1C = 0.10-10 pg DNA.cell(-1)). Furthermore, cladocerans have a higher slope of the relationship of body size with DNA content (1.5 vs. 0.28 in copepods) and present almost 15-fold higher RNA:DNA ratios (24.8 in cladocerans vs. 1.6 in copepods). Hence, small genome size in cladocerans could reflect an evolutionary pressure towards "efficient" genomes to conserve a key element needed to maximize growth rate. We do not claim that this is a universal cause of genome size variability, but propose that streamlining of genomes could be related to P conservation rather than energy conservation. This could be relevant for a range of organisms that may suffer P-limited growth rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18772946     DOI: 10.1139/G08-053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  8 in total

1.  Can resource costs of polyploidy provide an advantage to sex?

Authors:  M Neiman; A D Kay; A C Krist
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Divergent nucleic acid allocation in juvenile insects of different metamorphosis modes.

Authors:  Manuel Villar-Argaiz; Manuel J López-Rodríguez; J Manuel Tierno de Figueroa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Nitrogen limitation as a driver of genome size evolution in a group of karst plants.

Authors:  Ming Kang; Jing Wang; Hongwen Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Genome size in arthropods; different roles of phylogeny, habitat and life history in insects and crustaceans.

Authors:  Kristian Alfsnes; Hans Petter Leinaas; Dag Olav Hessen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Bromeliaceae subfamilies show divergent trends of genome size evolution.

Authors:  Lilian-Lee B Müller; Gerhard Zotz; Dirk C Albach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The salmon louse genome may be much larger than sequencing suggests.

Authors:  Grace A Wyngaard; Rasmus Skern-Mauritzen; Ketil Malde; Rachel Prendergast; Stefano Peruzzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Nutrient criteria to achieve New Zealand's riverine macroinvertebrate targets.

Authors:  Adam D Canning; Michael K Joy; Russell G Death
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Nucleic acid content in crustacean zooplankton: bridging metabolic and stoichiometric predictions.

Authors:  Francisco José Bullejos; Presentación Carrillo; Elena Gorokhova; Juan Manuel Medina-Sánchez; Manuel Villar-Argaiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.