BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low socioeconomic status is associated with stroke fatality; however, the mechanism behind this association is uncertain. We sought to determine whether residence in a low-income neighborhood was associated with admission to low-volume facilities and whether this contributed to differences in fatality after stroke. METHODS: All hospitalizations for ischemic stroke from April 2003 to March 2004 were identified from a national administrative database containing patient-level sociodemographic, diagnostic, procedural, and administrative information. Patients were assigned to income quintiles based on the median income of their primary neighborhood of residence and then categorized as low income (quintiles 1 and 2) or high income (quintiles 3 through 5). Hospitals were categorized as low or high volume on the basis of their annual number of stroke admissions. Multivariable analyses were performed to compare stroke fatality at 7 days and at discharge in patients in low- and high-income groups seen at low- and high-volume facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 25,228 patients with ischemic stroke were included in the analysis. Those from high-income areas were more likely to be admitted to high-volume hospitals. Fatality at 7 days was 8.4%, 8.2%, 7.7%, 7.1, and 6.6% (chi(2)=0.002) for income quintiles 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), respectively. Low-income patients admitted to low-volume hospitals had the highest risk-adjusted stroke fatality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients from low-income areas presenting with acute stroke are more likely to be seen in low-volume facilities. This subgroup of patients had a higher risk-adjusted fatality than those from high-income areas seen at high-volume facilities. Understanding the pathways through which socioeconomic status affects health care may lead to strategies for quality improvement.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low socioeconomic status is associated with stroke fatality; however, the mechanism behind this association is uncertain. We sought to determine whether residence in a low-income neighborhood was associated with admission to low-volume facilities and whether this contributed to differences in fatality after stroke. METHODS: All hospitalizations for ischemic stroke from April 2003 to March 2004 were identified from a national administrative database containing patient-level sociodemographic, diagnostic, procedural, and administrative information. Patients were assigned to income quintiles based on the median income of their primary neighborhood of residence and then categorized as low income (quintiles 1 and 2) or high income (quintiles 3 through 5). Hospitals were categorized as low or high volume on the basis of their annual number of stroke admissions. Multivariable analyses were performed to compare stroke fatality at 7 days and at discharge in patients in low- and high-income groups seen at low- and high-volume facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 25,228 patients with ischemic stroke were included in the analysis. Those from high-income areas were more likely to be admitted to high-volume hospitals. Fatality at 7 days was 8.4%, 8.2%, 7.7%, 7.1, and 6.6% (chi(2)=0.002) for income quintiles 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), respectively. Low-income patients admitted to low-volume hospitals had the highest risk-adjusted stroke fatality. CONCLUSIONS:Patients from low-income areas presenting with acute stroke are more likely to be seen in low-volume facilities. This subgroup of patients had a higher risk-adjusted fatality than those from high-income areas seen at high-volume facilities. Understanding the pathways through which socioeconomic status affects health care may lead to strategies for quality improvement.
Authors: Moira K Kapral; Jiming Fang; Crystal Chan; David A Alter; Susan E Bronskill; Michael D Hill; Douglas G Manuel; Jack V Tu; Geoffrey M Anderson Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: B Rachet; L Ellis; C Maringe; T Chu; U Nur; M Quaresma; A Shah; S Walters; L Woods; D Forman; M P Coleman Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ji-Yong Lee; Caroline King; Dana Stradling; Michael Warren; Dennis Nguyen; Johnny Lee; Mark A Riola; Ricardo Montoya; Dipika Patel; Vu H Le; Susan J Welbourne; Steven C Cramer Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Sumedha Chhatre; Jerry C Johnson; Stanley Bruce Malkowicz Journal: Health Policy Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Mary Egan; Lucy-Ann Kubina; Claire-Jehanne Dubouloz; Dorothy Kessler; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Michael Sawada Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Li-Jung E Ku; Malcolm P Cutchin; Kendra Heatwole-Shank; Lloyd J Edwards Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.966