Sandra A Billinger1, Benjamin Y Tseng, Patricia M Kluding. 1. Metabolic, Strength, and Energy Lab, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak) using traditional modes of testing such as treadmill or cycle ergometer can be difficult in individuals with stroke due to balance deficits, gait impairments, or decreased coordination. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the validity and feasibility of a modified exercise test using a total-body recumbent stepper (mTBRS-XT) in individuals after stroke. DESIGN: A within-subject design, with a sample of convenience, was used. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants (7 male, 4 female) with a mean of 40.1 months (SD=32.7) after stroke, a mean age of 60.9 years (SD=12.0), and mild to severe lower-extremity Fugl-Myer test scores (range=13-34) completed the study. METHODS: Participants performed 2 maximal-effort graded exercise tests on separate days using the mTBRS-XT and a cycle ergometer exercise protocol to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Measurements of Vo(2)peak and peak heart rate (peak HR) were obtained during both tests. RESULTS: A strong relationship existed between the mTBRS-XT and the cycle ergometer exercise test for Vo(2)peak and peak HR (r=.91 and .89, respectively). Mean Vo(2)peak was significantly higher for the mTBRS-XT (16.6 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)[SD=4.5]) compared with the cycle ergometer exercise protocol (15.4 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) [SD=4.5]). All participants performed the mTBRS-XT. One individual with severe stroke was unable to pedal the cycle ergometer. No significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The mTBRS-XT may be a safe, feasible, and valid exercise test to obtain measurements of Vo(2)peak in people with stroke. Health care professionals may use the mTBRS-XT to prescribe aerobic exercise based on Vo(2)peak values for individuals with mild to severe deficits after stroke.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Assessment of peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak) using traditional modes of testing such as treadmill or cycle ergometer can be difficult in individuals with stroke due to balance deficits, gait impairments, or decreased coordination. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the validity and feasibility of a modified exercise test using a total-body recumbent stepper (mTBRS-XT) in individuals after stroke. DESIGN: A within-subject design, with a sample of convenience, was used. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants (7 male, 4 female) with a mean of 40.1 months (SD=32.7) after stroke, a mean age of 60.9 years (SD=12.0), and mild to severe lower-extremity Fugl-Myer test scores (range=13-34) completed the study. METHODS:Participants performed 2 maximal-effort graded exercise tests on separate days using the mTBRS-XT and a cycle ergometer exercise protocol to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Measurements of Vo(2)peak and peak heart rate (peak HR) were obtained during both tests. RESULTS: A strong relationship existed between the mTBRS-XT and the cycle ergometer exercise test for Vo(2)peak and peak HR (r=.91 and .89, respectively). Mean Vo(2)peak was significantly higher for the mTBRS-XT (16.6 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)[SD=4.5]) compared with the cycle ergometer exercise protocol (15.4 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) [SD=4.5]). All participants performed the mTBRS-XT. One individual with severe stroke was unable to pedal the cycle ergometer. No significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The mTBRS-XT may be a safe, feasible, and valid exercise test to obtain measurements of Vo(2)peak in people with stroke. Health care professionals may use the mTBRS-XT to prescribe aerobic exercise based on Vo(2)peak values for individuals with mild to severe deficits after stroke.
Authors: Joni S Yates; Stephanie Studenski; Steven Gollub; Robert Whitman; Subashan Perera; Sue Min Lai; Pamela W Duncan Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Joanna O Kelly; Sharon L Kilbreath; Glen M Davis; Brian Zeman; Jacqui Raymond Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Neil F Gordon; Meg Gulanick; Fernando Costa; Gerald Fletcher; Barry A Franklin; Elliot J Roth; Tim Shephard Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kelly S Chu; Janice J Eng; Andrew S Dawson; Jocelyn E Harris; Atila Ozkaplan; Sif Gylfadóttir Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jason-Flor V Sisante; Anna E Mattlage; Ross Arena; Michael A Rippee; Sandra A Billinger Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Eric D Vidoni; Anna Mattlage; Jonathan Mahnken; Jeffrey M Burns; Joe McDonough; Sandra A Billinger Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Sandra A Billinger; Ellie VAN Swearingen; Megan McClain; Angela A Lentz; Mathew B Good Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Patricia M Kluding; J Robinson Singleton; Mamatha Pasnoor; Mazen M Dimachkie; Richard J Barohn; A Gordon Smith; Robin L Marcus Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: Eric D Vidoni; Angela Van Sciver; David K Johnson; Jinghua He; Robyn Honea; Brian Haines; Jami Goodwin; M Pat Laubinger; Heather S Anderson; Patricia M Kluding; Joseph E Donnelly; Sandra A Billinger; Jeffrey M Burns Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 2.226