Literature DB >> 18771504

Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns.

Eduardo Pineda1, Jorge M Lobo.   

Abstract

1. Evaluating the distribution of species richness where biodiversity is high but has been insufficiently sampled is not an easy task. Species distribution modelling has become a useful approach for predicting their ranges, based on the relationships between species records and environmental variables. Overlapping predictions of individual distributions could be a useful strategy for obtaining estimates of species richness and composition in a region, but these estimates should be evaluated using a proper validation process, which compares the predicted richness values and composition with accurate data from independent sources. 2. In this study, we propose a simple approach to estimate model performance for several distributional predictions generated simultaneously. This approach is particularly suitable when species distribution modelling techniques that require only presence data are used. 3. The individual distributions for the 370 known amphibian species of Mexico were predicted using maxent to model data on their known presence (66,113 presence-only records). Distributions were subsequently overlapped to obtain a prediction of species richness. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the overall species richness values predicted for the region with observed and predicted values from 118 well-surveyed sites, each with an area of c. 100 km(2), which were identified using species accumulation curves and nonparametric estimators. 4. The derived models revealed a remarkable heterogeneity of species richness across the country, provided information about species composition per site and allowed us to obtain a measure of the spatial distribution of prediction errors. Examining the magnitude and location of model inaccuracies, as well as separately assessing errors of both commission and omission, highlights the inaccuracy of the predictions of species distribution models and the need to provide measures of uncertainty along with the model results. 5. The combination of a species distribution modelling method like maxent and species richness estimators offers a useful tool for identifying when the overall pattern provided by all model predictions might be representing the geographical patterns of species richness and composition, regardless of the particular quality or accuracy of the predictions for each individual species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18771504     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01471.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  18 in total

1.  Can Species Distribution Models Aid Bioassessment when Reference Sites are Lacking? Tests Based on Freshwater Fishes.

Authors:  Ben J Labay; Dean A Hendrickson; Adam E Cohen; Timothy H Bonner; Ryan S King; Leroy J Kleinsasser; Gordon W Linam; Kirk O Winemiller
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Use of arthropod rarity for area prioritisation: insights from the Azorean Islands.

Authors:  Simone Fattorini; Pedro Cardoso; François Rigal; Paulo A V Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Do stacked species distribution models reflect altitudinal diversity patterns?

Authors:  Rubén G Mateo; Ángel M Felicísimo; Julien Pottier; Antoine Guisan; Jesús Muñoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Modelling Niche Differentiation of Co-Existing, Elusive and Morphologically Similar Species: A Case Study of Four Macaque Species in Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area, Laos.

Authors:  Camille N Z Coudrat; K Anne-Isola Nekaris
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Climate change and the distribution of neotropical red-bellied toads (Melanophryniscus, Anura, Amphibia): how to prioritize species and populations?

Authors:  Caroline Zank; Fernando Gertum Becker; Michelle Abadie; Diego Baldo; Raúl Maneyro; Márcio Borges-Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Novel data on the ecology of Cochranella mache (Anura: Centrolenidae) and the importance of protected areas for this critically endangered glassfrog in the neotropics.

Authors:  H Mauricio Ortega-Andrade; Octavio Rojas-Soto; Christian Paucar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Vertebrate dissimilarity due to turnover and richness differences in a highly beta-diverse region: the role of spatial grain size, dispersal ability and distance.

Authors:  Jaime M Calderón-Patrón; Claudia E Moreno; Rubén Pineda-López; Gerardo Sánchez-Rojas; Iriana Zuria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Legume diversity patterns in West Central Africa: influence of species biology on distribution models.

Authors:  Manuel de la Estrella; Rubén G Mateo; Jan J Wieringa; Barbara Mackinder; Jesús Muñoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania.

Authors:  Dan Cogălniceanu; Laurentiu Rozylowicz; Paul Székely; Ciprian Samoilă; Florina Stănescu; Marian Tudor; Diana Székely; Ruben Iosif
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.546

10.  Modeling Hawaiian ecosystem degradation due to invasive plants under current and future climates.

Authors:  Adam E Vorsino; Lucas B Fortini; Fred A Amidon; Stephen E Miller; James D Jacobi; Jonathan P Price; Sam 'ohukani'ohi'a Gon; Gregory A Koob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.