Literature DB >> 18771489

A comparative ID migraine screener study in ophthalmology, ENT and neurology out-patient clinics.

M Ertaş1, B Baykan, D Tuncel, M Gökçe, F Gökçay, H Sirin, O Deniz, V Oztürk, F Idiman, N Karli, M Zarifoğlu, N Yildiz, A Siva, S Saip, B Göksan, F Ak, U Aluçlu, T Duman, I M Melek, S Bulut, S Berilgen.   

Abstract

Migraine is more likely to be misdiagnosed in patients with comorbid diseases. Not only primary care physicians, but also specialists might misdiagnose it due to the lack of diagnostic criteria awareness. The ID migraine test is a reliable screening instrument that may facilitate and accelerate migraine recognition. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and characteristics of migraine in a large sample of patients admitted to clinics of ophthalmology (OC), ear, nose and throat diseases (ENTC) and neurology (NC), as well as to validate the use of the ID migraine test in OC and ENTC settings. This was a multicentre (11 cites) study of out-patients admitting either to NC, ENTC or OC of the study sites during five consecutive working days within 1 week. From each of the clinics, 100 patients were planned to be recruited. All recruited patients were interviewed and those having a headache complaint received an ID migraine test and were examined for headache diagnosis by a neurologist, blinded to the ID migraine test result. A total of 2625 subjects were recruited. Only 1.3% of OC patients and 5.4% of ENTC patients have been admitted with a primary complaint of headache, whereas the percentage of NC patients suffering from headache was 37.6%. Whereas 138 patients (19.3%) in OC, 154 (17.3%) in ENTC and 347 (34%) in NC were found to be ID migraine test positive, 149 patients (20.8%) in OC, 142 (16%) in ENTC and 338 (33.1%) in NC were diagnosed with migraine. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive ratios of the ID migraine test were found to be similar in all clinics. An important fraction of the patients admitted to NC, as well as to OC and ENTC, for headache and/or other complaints were found out to have migraine by means of a simple screening test. This study validated the ID migraine test as a sensitive and specific tool in OC and ENTC, encouraging its use as a screening instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18771489     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01702.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  5 in total

Review 1.  Vestibular Migraine.

Authors:  Gülden Akdal
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 1.339

2.  Design, construction, and technical implementation of a web-based interdisciplinary symptom evaluation (WISE) - a heuristic proposal for orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Dominik A Ettlin; Isabelle Sommer; Ben Brönnimann; Sergio Maffioletti; Jörg Scheidt; Mei-Yin Hou; Nenad Lukic; Beat Steiger
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.277

3.  The diagnostic accuracy of headache measurement instruments: A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on headaches associated with musculoskeletal symptoms.

Authors:  Hedwig A van der Meer; Corine M Visscher; Tom Vredeveld; Maria Wg Nijhuis van der Sanden; Raoul Hh Engelbert; Caroline M Speksnijder
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  Validation of the "My Headache Checker" that includes osmophobia in the diagnosis of migraine.

Authors:  Masahide Matsushita; Kaori Matsumoto; Satoko Kitamura; Naoki Komatsu; Hiromi Seo; Seisho Takeuchi
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2020-09-03

5.  Diagnostic and classification tools for chronic headache disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Potter; Katrin Probyn; Celia Bernstein; Tamar Pincus; Martin Underwood; Manjit Matharu
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 6.292

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.