Literature DB >> 18770525

New evidence of preference reversals in health utility measurement.

Han Bleichrodt1, Jose Luis Pinto Prades.   

Abstract

A central assumption in health utility measurement is that preferences are invariant to the elicitation method used. This assumption is challenged by preference reversals. Previous studies have observed preference reversals between choice and matching tasks and between choice and ranking tasks. We present a preference reversal that is entirely derived from choices, the basic primitive of economics and utility theory. The preference reversal was observed in two studies regarding health states after stroke. Both studies involved large representative samples from the Spanish population, interviewed professionally, and face-to-face. Possible explanations for the preference reversal are the anticipation of disappointment and elation in risky choice and the impact of ethical considerations about the value of life. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18770525     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  4 in total

Review 1.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Trust me; I know what I am doing investigating the effect of choice list elicitation and domain-relevant training on preference reversals in decision making for others.

Authors:  Sebastian Neumann-Böhme; Stefan A Lipman; Werner B F Brouwer; Arthur E Attema
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-03-20

3.  Transitivity in health utility measurement: An experimental analysis.

Authors:  Ulrich Schmidt; Michael Stolpe
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2011-08-30

Review 4.  Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?

Authors:  Mike Tweed; Tim Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.