PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the optimal antenna spacing to achieve large ablative zones without indentations when microwave ablation is performed with simultaneous activation of two or three antennas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microwave ablation was performed with single-antenna activation and simultaneous activation of two or three antennas with a spacing of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 cm in explanted bovine livers. Microwave energy was applied for 10 min with a power of 45 W. The shapes and sizes of the ablative zones created were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The shape of the ablative zone was ellipsoid in the axial plane (along the antenna axis) and spherical in the transverse plane (perpendicular to the antenna axis) in single-antenna ablation. The ablative zones were spherical or ellipsoid in both the axial and transverse planes in two-and three-antenna ablation with an antenna spacing of 2.0 cm or less. Indentations were observed between the ablative zones created by the antennas when the spacing was 2.5 cm or more, reducing the minimum transverse diameter. When two-or three-antenna ablation was performed with a spacing of 2.0 cm or less, the axial and minimum transverse diameters were significantly larger than in single-antenna ablation. The largest volume (almost two or three times the single-activation volume) was achieved in two-or three-antenna ablation with an antenna spacing of 2.0 cm. CONCLUSION: We found that simultaneous microwave ablation using multiple microwave antennas creates large ablative zones without indentations when multiple antennas are activated with an antenna spacing of 2.0 cm or less.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the optimal antenna spacing to achieve large ablative zones without indentations when microwave ablation is performed with simultaneous activation of two or three antennas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microwave ablation was performed with single-antenna activation and simultaneous activation of two or three antennas with a spacing of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 cm in explanted bovine livers. Microwave energy was applied for 10 min with a power of 45 W. The shapes and sizes of the ablative zones created were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The shape of the ablative zone was ellipsoid in the axial plane (along the antenna axis) and spherical in the transverse plane (perpendicular to the antenna axis) in single-antenna ablation. The ablative zones were spherical or ellipsoid in both the axial and transverse planes in two-and three-antenna ablation with an antenna spacing of 2.0 cm or less. Indentations were observed between the ablative zones created by the antennas when the spacing was 2.5 cm or more, reducing the minimum transverse diameter. When two-or three-antenna ablation was performed with a spacing of 2.0 cm or less, the axial and minimum transverse diameters were significantly larger than in single-antenna ablation. The largest volume (almost two or three times the single-activation volume) was achieved in two-or three-antenna ablation with an antenna spacing of 2.0 cm. CONCLUSION: We found that simultaneous microwave ablation using multiple microwave antennas creates large ablative zones without indentations when multiple antennas are activated with an antenna spacing of 2.0 cm or less.
Authors: S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Lisa A Sampson; Tina M Frey; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stefaan Mulier; Yicheng Ni; Lars Frich; Fernando Burdio; Alban L Denys; Jean-François De Wispelaere; Benoît Dupas; Nagy Habib; Michael Hoey; Maarten C Jansen; Marc Lacrosse; Raymond Leveillee; Yi Miao; Peter Mulier; Didier Mutter; Kelvin K Ng; Roberto Santambrogio; Dirk Stippel; Katsuyoshi Tamaki; Thomas M van Gulik; Guy Marchal; Luc Michel Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: T Seki; M Wakabayashi; T Nakagawa; T Itho; T Shiro; K Kunieda; M Sato; S Uchiyama; K Inoue Journal: Cancer Date: 1994-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Meghan G Lubner; Tim J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee; Lisa A Sampson; Christopher L Brace Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Colin M Harari; Michelle Magagna; Mariajose Bedoya; Fred T Lee; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Timothy Ziemlewicz; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Theodora A Potretzke; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Christopher L Brace; Parul Agarwal; Fred T Lee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Meghan G Lubner; Christopher L Brace; Tim J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.333