Literature DB >> 18769990

Joint congruency as an indication for rotational acetabular osteotomy.

Kunihiko Okano1, Hiroshi Enomoto, Makoto Osaki, Hiroyuki Shindo.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Long-term results of periacetabular osteotomy for advanced-stage osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip are reportedly unsatisfactory compared with results for early-stage osteoarthritis. Other preoperative information that can be used to determine indications for periacetabular osteotomy is therefore important to avoid performing osteotomy in young patients with advanced-stage osteoarthritis who would not likely achieve substantial benefit. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients (49 hips) with advanced-stage osteoarthritis who underwent rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) using preoperative congruency in abduction. The minimum postoperative followup was 8 years (mean, 12.3 years; range, 8-20 years) and mean age at surgery was 43.1 years (range, 30-59 years). At followup, osteoarthritic stage was improved in 12 hips, unchanged in 24 hips, and had progressed in 13 hips. Preoperative joint congruency in abduction was good in 13 hips, poor in 32 hips, and narrowed in four hips. Patients with better congruency in abduction had better results. We believe osteoarthritis with good congruency in abduction preoperatively remains a good indication for RAO even in advanced stages of disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769990      PMCID: PMC2650062          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0443-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

1.  Long-term results of rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients with slight narrowing of the joint space on preoperative radiographic findings.

Authors:  Y Takatori; S Ninomiya; S Nakamura; S Morimoto; T Moro; I Nagai; A Mabuchi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Treatment of the dysplastic acetabulum with Wagner spherical osteotomy. A study of patients followed for a minimum of twenty years.

Authors:  Michael Schramm; Dietrich Hohmann; Martin Radespiel-Troger; Rocco Paolo Pitto
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hips with end-stage osteoarthrosis--a biological alternative to total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  H Kanai; Y Takatori; T Umeyama; S Nakamura; S Morimoto; S Ninomiya
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone.

Authors:  H H Steel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Long-term results of rotational acetabular osteotomy in young patients with advanced osteoarthrosis of the hip.

Authors:  Y Takatori; S Ninomiya; S Nakamura; S Morimoto; T Moro; I Nagai
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia. A follow-up for more than ten years.

Authors:  Masahiko Nozawa; Katsuo Shitoto; Kejii Matsuda; Katuhiko Maezawa; Hisashi Kurosawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

7.  The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery as an indication for rotational acetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Y Yasunaga; Y Ikuta; T Kanazawa; K Takahashi; T Hisatome
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-09

8.  Rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients forty-six years of age or older: comparison with younger patients.

Authors:  Y Yasunaga; K Takahashi; M Ochi; Y Ikuta; T Hisatome; J Nakashiro; S Yamamoto
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Rotational acetabular osteotomy for advanced osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  K Okano; H Enomoto; M Osaki; H Shindo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-01

10.  Lessons learned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies.

Authors:  Robert T Trousdale; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Limited intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the common measures of hip joint congruency used in dysplasia.

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; Brien Rabenhorst; Adriana De La Rocha; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen; Anders Troelsen; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The interface between periacetabular osteotomy, hip arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty in the young adult hip.

Authors:  Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Søren Overgaard; Kjeld Søballe; Ole Ovesen; Bjarne Mygind-Klavsen; Christian Andreas Dippmann; Michael Ulrich Jensen; Jens Stürup; Jens Retpen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-07-11

5.  Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Tohru Irie; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Tomoyo Y Irie; Shane J Nho; Daisuke Takahashi; Norimasa Iwasaki; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.