Literature DB >> 18769667

A Review of NICHD Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: The Importance of Speaking a Common Language When Describing Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Barrett Robinson1.   

Abstract

Despite evidence demonstrating no neonatal benefit, the medicolegal climate in the United States requires obstetricians to integrate continuous intrapartum surveillance into their care of the pregnant laboring patient. The intent of this article is to familiarize the reader with the standardized, quantitative nomenclature recommended to describe intrapartum cardiotocography in order to reduce miscommunication among providers caring for the laboring patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic fetal monitoring; Intrapartum cardiotocography; NICHD nomenclature

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769667      PMCID: PMC2505172     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1941-2797


  7 in total

1.  Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association?

Authors:  J T Parer; T King; S Flanders; M Fox; S J Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2006-05

2.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Classification and prognosis of fetal heart rate patterns.

Authors:  H B Krebs; R E Petres; L J Dunn; H V Jordaan; A Segreti
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracings.

Authors:  M Helfand; K Marton; K Ueland
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; D Devane; G M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

Review 5.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms.

Authors:  P V Nielsen; B Stigsby; C Nickelsen; J Nim
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Births: final data for 2002.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; Fay Menacker; Martha L Munson
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2003-12-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.