Julian H Barth1, Paul E C Sibley. 1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX. julian.barth@leedsth.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of disorders of growth hormone (GH) secretion is based on the measurement of GH before and after dynamic stimulation or suppression tests. Over the years, specific cut-off values have been proposed without taking account of the considerable variation in results obtained using different methods for analysing GH. Recent publications have recommended the standardization of GH assays using IS 98/574, which is calibrated in mass and units (U). The IMMULITE range of GH assays have been recalibrated using this standard. METHODS: We analysed 745 samples using the current and the restandardized GH assay kits. This series of samples contained 90 stimulation tests and seven suppression tests. RESULTS: The data comparing the current and restandardized assays show a similar relationship for both basal and stimulated GH values for all IMMULITE platforms. There is a negative bias by the restandardized assay above approximately 20 microg/L. A conversion can be derived from this study which would mean that patient GH results expressed in milliunits per litre of IMMULITE in-house derived standard will be approximately three-fold of that expressed in micrograms per litre of IS 98/574. CONCLUSION: Use of IS 98/574 offers standardized reporting in microgram per litre IS 98/574. This will permit compliance with the consensus recommendations and the development of a firm evidence base for defining decision-making GH values.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of disorders of growth hormone (GH) secretion is based on the measurement of GH before and after dynamic stimulation or suppression tests. Over the years, specific cut-off values have been proposed without taking account of the considerable variation in results obtained using different methods for analysing GH. Recent publications have recommended the standardization of GH assays using IS 98/574, which is calibrated in mass and units (U). The IMMULITE range of GH assays have been recalibrated using this standard. METHODS: We analysed 745 samples using the current and the restandardized GH assay kits. This series of samples contained 90 stimulation tests and seven suppression tests. RESULTS: The data comparing the current and restandardized assays show a similar relationship for both basal and stimulated GH values for all IMMULITE platforms. There is a negative bias by the restandardized assay above approximately 20 microg/L. A conversion can be derived from this study which would mean that patient GH results expressed in milliunits per litre of IMMULITE in-house derived standard will be approximately three-fold of that expressed in micrograms per litre of IS 98/574. CONCLUSION: Use of IS 98/574 offers standardized reporting in microgram per litre IS 98/574. This will permit compliance with the consensus recommendations and the development of a firm evidence base for defining decision-making GH values.